 |
AMD EPYC 7473X vs Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 |
|
Processor comparisons 29-03-2023
For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 7473X vs Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 and see which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, rendering, programming, streaming, video editing. Here you can find useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as PassMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, 7zip, VeraCrypt, Blender, 3DMark, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, MATLAB, Furmark, Gears 5, WPrime, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator, Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, SuperPi, RealBench, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Halo Infinite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valorant
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 or AMD EPYC 7473X.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7473X | 67% |
Xeon E5-2697R v4 | 55% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7473X is 17% better than Xeon E5-2697R v4. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7473X | 74% |
Xeon E5-2697R v4 | 61% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, Half-Life: Alyx, DOTA 2A, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Battlefield V, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), Horizon Zero Dawn, Control, Metro Exodus, Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 130.7 | 108.6 | | Valorant | 148.5 | 123.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 83.2 | 69.1 | | Apex Legends | 139.6 | 116.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 111.4 | 92.6 | | Overwatch | 120.3 | 100.0 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 102.5 | 85.2 | | DOOM Eternal | 74.3 | 61.7 | | Warzone | 115.8 | 96.3 | | Assassin's Creed | 124.8 | 103.7 | | Valheim | 123.3 | 102.5 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7473X | 20% |
Xeon E5-2697R v4 | 20% |
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7473X |
Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 170 | 108 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 7201 | 3177 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 322 | 240 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 15268 | 7475 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 804 | 641 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 39707 | 18061 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7473X |
Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 | | Single-Core | 1812 | 1916 | | Multi-Core | 58245 | 18383 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7473X |
Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 | | Single-Core | 1489 | 910 | | Multi-Core | 41864 | 20218 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7473X |
Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 | | Announcement date | March 22, 2022 | January 01, 2021 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | FCLGA2011-3 | | Core name | Milan | Broadwell | | Architecture | Zen 3 | x86 | | Generation | 3 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 3.6 MHz | | Frequency | 2.8 MHz | 2.3 MHz | | Cores | 24 | 18 | | Threads | 48 | 36 | | Bus rate | | 9.6 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 54000 millions | 4130 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 240 W | 145 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 1600/1866/2133/2400 | | Max. Memory | | 15 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 768MB | 45 MB | | Overclocking | No | Yes | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000507
100-000000507​WOF | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7473X is 17% better than Xeon E5-2697R v4 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7473X has 6 more core than Xeon E5-2697R v4. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7473X is better: 29
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 is better: 7
However, it should be understood that all the number in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 7473X and Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7473X Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i9-10920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
• Vs Core i9-7940X
• Vs Core i9-7960X
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Core i9-9820X
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i9-10900E
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i3-12100E
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i3-12100TE
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Core i7-1265UE
• Vs Core i7-1265UL
• Vs Core i7-1255UL
• Vs Core i5-1235UL
• Vs Core i5-1245UL
• Vs Core i5-1245UE
• Vs Core i3-1220PE
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
