|
Intel Core i3-12300T vs Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 |
|
Processor comparisons 11-01-2022 Perhaps you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i3-12300T vs Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 and decide which is better for games or normal use for rendering, programming, machine learning, video editing, streaming. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), VeraCrypt, Handbrake, AIDA64, 3DMark, PassMark, RealBench, 7zip, Furmark, WPrime, Prime95, SuperPi, Gears 5, PCMark 10, UserBenchmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fallout 76
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fortnite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valheim
- Watch Dogs Legion
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 or Intel Core i3-12300T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-12300T | 56% |
Xeon E5-2697R v4 | 55% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-12300T is 1% better than Xeon E5-2697R v4. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-12300T | 54% |
Xeon E5-2697R v4 | 61% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Battlefield V, Control, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, League of Legends (LOL), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 95.8 | 108.6 | Valorant | 108.9 | 123.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.0 | 69.1 | Apex Legends | 102.3 | 116.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 81.6 | 92.6 | Overwatch | 88.2 | 100.0 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.1 | 85.2 | DOOM Eternal | 54.4 | 61.7 | Warzone | 84.9 | 96.3 | Assassin's Creed | 91.4 | 103.7 | Valheim | 90.4 | 102.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-12300T | 161% |
Xeon E5-2697R v4 | 20% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-12300T is more energy efficient than the Xeon E5-2697R v4 since it has less power consumption: 35W vs. 145W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-12300T |
Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 259 | 108 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1905 | 3177 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 624 | 240 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 4324 | 7475 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1462 | 641 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14253 | 18061 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-12300T |
Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 | Single-Core | 3419 | 1916 | Multi-Core | 19953 | 18383 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-12300T |
Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 | Single-Core | 1692 | 910 | Multi-Core | 7642 | 20218 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-12300T |
Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 | Announcement date | January 07, 2022 | January 01, 2021 | Type | Desktop | Server | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCLGA2011-3 | Core name | Alder Lake | Broadwell | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 12 | 4 | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 MHz | 3.6 MHz | Frequency | 1 MHz | 2.3 MHz | Cores | 4 | 18 | Threads | 8 | 36 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 9.6 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 9800 millions | 4130 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 145 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4 1600/1866/2133/2400 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 15 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | 5 MB | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 45 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | Yes | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon E5-2697R v4 is 56% better than Core i3-12300T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Xeon E5-2697R v4 has 14 more core than Core i3-12300T. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-12300T is better: 14
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 is better: 22 Although it should be understood that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i3-12300T and Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i3-12300T Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i3-12100TE • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Core i5-12500TE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i3-12100E • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i7-1265UE • Vs Core i7-1265UL • Vs Core i5-1250PE • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F
Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i3-12100E • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i3-12100TE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Core i7-1265UE • Vs Core i7-1265UL • Vs Core i7-1255UL • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Core i5-1245UL • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Core i3-1220PE • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|