|
Intel Core i9-10900E vs Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 |
|
Processor comparisons 12-06-2021 For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i9-10900E vs Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 tests and understand which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, video editing, programming, rendering, streaming. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as PassMark, Dolphin Emulator, RealBench, Prime95, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 7zip, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Handbrake, WPrime, AIDA64, MATLAB, PCMark 10, UserBenchmark, Gears 5, VeraCrypt, Furmark, Blender. Gaming performance of processors in: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Death Stranding
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valheim
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Borderlands 3
- Fallout 76
- Halo Infinite
- Grand Theft Auto V
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 or Intel Core i9-10900E.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i9-10900E | 55% |
Xeon E5-2697R v4 | 55% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i9-10900E | 55% |
Xeon E5-2697R v4 | 61% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Microsoft Flight Simulator, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 98.3 | 108.6 | Valorant | 111.7 | 123.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 62.6 | 69.1 | Apex Legends | 105.0 | 116.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 83.8 | 92.6 | Overwatch | 90.5 | 100.0 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 77.1 | 85.2 | DOOM Eternal | 55.9 | 61.7 | Warzone | 87.1 | 96.3 | Assassin's Creed | 93.8 | 103.7 | Valheim | 92.7 | 102.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i9-10900E | 68% |
Xeon E5-2697R v4 | 20% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-10900E is more energy efficient than the Xeon E5-2697R v4 as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 145W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-10900E |
Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 213 | 108 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2263 | 3177 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 496 | 240 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5050 | 7475 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1212 | 641 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 11753 | 18061 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-10900E |
Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 | Single-Core | 2702 | 1916 | Multi-Core | 17703 | 18383 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-10900E |
Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 | Single-Core | 1329 | 910 | Multi-Core | 10110 | 20218 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i9-10900E |
Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 | Announcement date | April 01, 2020 | January 01, 2021 | Type | Embedded System | Server | Socket | FCLGA1200 | FCLGA2011-3 | Core name | Comet Lake | Broadwell | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 10 | 4 | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 MHz | 3.6 MHz | Frequency | 2.8 MHz | 2.3 MHz | Cores | 10 | 18 | Threads | 20 | 36 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 9.6 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 9200 millions | 4130 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 145 W | Memory type | DDR4-2933 | DDR4 1600/1866/2133/2400 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 15 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 20 MB | 45 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | Yes | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-10900E is 17% better than Xeon E5-2697R v4 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Xeon E5-2697R v4 has 8 more core than Core i9-10900E. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10900E is better: 11
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 is better: 24 However, it should be realized that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i9-10900E and Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i9-10900E Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Core i3-12100TE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Core i7-1265UE • Vs Core i7-1255UL • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Core i5-1245UL • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Core i3-1215UL • Vs Core i3-1220PE • Vs Core i3-N305
Intel Xeon E5-2697R v4 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i3-12100E • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i3-12100TE • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Core i7-1265UE • Vs Core i7-1265UL • Vs Core i7-1255UL • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Core i5-1245UL • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Core i3-1220PE • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|