|
Intel Core i5-13500H vs Apple M1 Ultra |
|
Processor comparisons 29-01-2023 Perhaps you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i5-13500H vs Apple M1 Ultra tests and understand which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, video editing, rendering, programming, streaming. Here you can find all information from many benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), VeraCrypt, AIDA64, Dolphin Emulator, Furmark, MATLAB, UserBenchmark, SuperPi, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, 7zip, WPrime, Blender, Gears 5, RealBench, PCMark 10, Prime95, Handbrake. Gaming performance of processors in: - Last Man Standing
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fortnite
- Apex Legends
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Halo Infinite
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Overwatch
- Rainbow Six Siege
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Apple M1 Ultra or Intel Core i5-13500H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13500H | 57% |
M1 Ultra | 68% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, M1 Ultra is 16% better than Core i5-13500H. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13500H | 56% |
M1 Ultra | 64% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx, Metro Exodus, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL), Control, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 99.0 | 113.1 | Valorant | 112.5 | 128.6 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.0 | 72.0 | Apex Legends | 105.7 | 120.8 | Call of Duty Warzone | 84.4 | 96.4 | Overwatch | 91.1 | 104.1 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 77.6 | 88.7 | DOOM Eternal | 56.2 | 64.3 | Warzone | 87.7 | 100.3 | Assassin's Creed | 94.5 | 108.0 | Valheim | 93.4 | 106.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13500H | 123% |
M1 Ultra | 272% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the M1 Ultra is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13500H since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 20W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13500H |
Apple M1 Ultra | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 249 | 555 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2288 | 3252 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 393 | 1103 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5045 | 5583 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1302 | 4240 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14449 | 21959 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13500H |
Apple M1 Ultra | Single-Core | 1193 | 9611 | Multi-Core | 24604 | 62194 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13500H |
Apple M1 Ultra | Single-Core | 1670 | 1637 | Multi-Core | 10773 | 24642 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-13500H |
Apple M1 Ultra | Announcement date | January 21, 2023 | April 09, 2022 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | FCBGA1744 | M1 | Core name | Raptor Lake | 16x Firestorm and 4x Icestorm | Architecture | x86 | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Generation | 13 | 1 | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 MHz | | Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 3.2 MHz | Cores | 12 | 20 | Threads | 16 | 20 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 114000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 20 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | LPDDR5 - Up to 6400MHz | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 6400 | Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 818 GByte/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | 4MB | L2 cache | 6 MB | 48MB | L3 cache | 18 MB | 96MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| APL1W06 | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13500H is 8% better than M1 Ultra in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that M1 Ultra has 8 more core than Core i5-13500H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13500H is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Apple M1 Ultra is better: 29 However, it should be understood that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i5-13500H and Apple M1 Ultra before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-13500H Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 7 7730U • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 5 7520U • Vs Ryzen 3 7320U • Vs Ryzen 5 5560U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Apple M1 Ultra Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
| |
|