|
Intel Core i9-13900F vs Apple M1 Ultra |
|
Processor comparisons 29-01-2023 If you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i9-13900F vs Apple M1 Ultra tests and see which is better for games or normal use for video editing, rendering, machine learning, streaming, programming. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or various benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, Handbrake, Prime95, UserBenchmark, VeraCrypt, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, AIDA64, PCMark 10, Furmark, Gears 5, RealBench, SuperPi, DaVinci Resolve Studio, WPrime, PassMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark. Gaming performance of processors in: - Death Stranding
- Fortnite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fallout 76
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valorant
- Last Man Standing
- Watch Dogs Legion
- DOOM: Eternal
- Overwatch
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Halo Infinite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Valheim
- Apex Legends
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Apple M1 Ultra or Intel Core i9-13900F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i9-13900F | 67% |
M1 Ultra | 68% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, M1 Ultra is 1% better than Core i9-13900F. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i9-13900F | 62% |
M1 Ultra | 64% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, Control, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL), Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, Metro Exodus, Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 109.8 | 113.1 | Valorant | 124.7 | 128.6 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 69.9 | 72.0 | Apex Legends | 117.3 | 120.8 | Call of Duty Warzone | 93.6 | 96.4 | Overwatch | 101.0 | 104.1 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 86.1 | 88.7 | DOOM Eternal | 62.4 | 64.3 | Warzone | 97.3 | 100.3 | Assassin's Creed | 104.8 | 108.0 | Valheim | 103.5 | 106.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i9-13900F | 100% |
M1 Ultra | 272% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the M1 Ultra is more energy efficient than the Core i9-13900F since it has less power consumption: 65W vs. 20W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, streaming, machine learning, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-13900F |
Apple M1 Ultra | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 516 | 555 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5321 | 3252 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 853 | 1103 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 11816 | 5583 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2998 | 4240 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 33980 | 21959 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900F |
Apple M1 Ultra | Single-Core | 2740 | 9611 | Multi-Core | 57909 | 62194 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900F |
Apple M1 Ultra | Single-Core | 1965 | 1637 | Multi-Core | 21341 | 24642 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i9-13900F |
Apple M1 Ultra | Announcement date | January 19, 2023 | April 09, 2022 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | M1 | Core name | Raptor Lake | 16x Firestorm and 4x Icestorm | Architecture | x86 | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Generation | 13 | 1 | Turbo Frequency | 5.6 MHz | | Frequency | 4.2 MHz | 3.2 MHz | Cores | 24 | 20 | Threads | 32 | 20 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 114000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 20 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | LPDDR5 - Up to 6400MHz | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 6400 | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 818 GByte/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | 4MB | L2 cache | 8 MB | 48MB | L3 cache | 36 MB | 96MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | | APL1W06 | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-13900F is 23% better than M1 Ultra in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-13900F has 4 more core than M1 Ultra. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13900F is better: 15
The number of parameters for which Apple M1 Ultra is better: 22 However, it should be understood that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i9-13900F and Apple M1 Ultra before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i9-13900F Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Apple M1 Ultra Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
| |
|