|
Apple M1 Ultra vs Intel Core i5-10400 |
|
Processor comparisons 12-02-2023 Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Apple M1 Ultra vs Intel Core i5-10400 tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for streaming, programming, video editing, rendering, machine learning. Here you can find all information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as Furmark, SuperPi, VeraCrypt, WPrime, Prime95, 3DMark, PCMark 10, RealBench, UserBenchmark, Gears 5, Blender, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Handbrake, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, PassMark. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Fortnite
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Halo Infinite
- Apex Legends
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Overwatch
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Last Man Standing
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- DOOM: Eternal
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-10400 or Apple M1 Ultra.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
M1 Ultra | 68% |
Core i5-10400 | 53% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, M1 Ultra is 22% better than Core i5-10400. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.M1 Ultra | 64% |
Core i5-10400 | 53% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Control.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 113.1 | 94.8 | Valorant | 128.6 | 107.7 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 72.0 | 60.3 | Apex Legends | 120.8 | 101.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 96.4 | 80.8 | Overwatch | 104.1 | 87.2 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 88.7 | 74.3 | DOOM Eternal | 64.3 | 53.9 | Warzone | 100.3 | 84.0 | Assassin's Creed | 108.0 | 90.5 | Valheim | 106.7 | 89.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
M1 Ultra | 272% |
Core i5-10400 | 63% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the M1 Ultra is more energy efficient than the Core i5-10400 as it consumes less power: 20W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Apple M1 Ultra |
Intel Core i5-10400 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 555 | 190 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3252 | 1341 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 1103 | 450 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5583 | 3197 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 4240 | 1110 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 21959 | 7610 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Apple M1 Ultra |
Intel Core i5-10400 | Single-Core | 9611 | 2626 | Multi-Core | 62194 | 12503 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Apple M1 Ultra |
Intel Core i5-10400 | Single-Core | 1637 | 1245 | Multi-Core | 24642 | 6654 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Apple M1 Ultra |
Intel Core i5-10400 | Announcement date | April 09, 2022 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | M1 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | 16x Firestorm and 4x Icestorm | Comet Lake | Architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | x86 | Generation | 1 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | | 4.3 MHz | Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 2.9 MHz | Cores | 20 | 6 | Threads | 20 | 12 | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 114000 millions | 4800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 20 W | 65 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 - Up to 6400MHz | DDR4-2666 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6400 | | Memory bandwidth | 818 GByte/s | 41.6 GB/s | L1 cache | 4MB | | L2 cache | 48MB | | L3 cache | 96MB | 12 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | APL1W06 | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here M1 Ultra is 9% better than Core i5-10400 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that M1 Ultra has 14 more core than Core i5-10400. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple M1 Ultra is better: 33
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-10400 is better: 4 Although it should be understood that the summary data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of Apple M1 Ultra and Intel Core i5-10400 before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Apple M1 Ultra Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i5-10400 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Core i3-11100B • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Xeon W-10855M • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i7-9750HF • Vs Core i7-9850H • Vs Core i7-9700T • Vs Core i7-8700T • Vs Core i5-9600KF • Vs Core i7-8700B • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i7-6850K • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i3-8100 • Vs Core i5-6600K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Core i5-6500T • Vs Core i5-7600K • Vs Ryzen 5 1500X • Vs Core i3-7100 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
| |
|