|
Apple A15 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 |
|
Comparisons 14-09-2022 Detailed comparison data of Apple A15 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like Quadrant, Geekbench, 3DMark, Neocore, PassMark, GFXBench, PCMark, Vellamo, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Fortnite, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, PUBG, GTA, Call of Duty, Madout2 etc. After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy A15 Bionic or MediaTek Dimensity 9000.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreA15 Bionic | 60% |
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | 73% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)A15 Bionic | 80% |
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | 82% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingA15 Bionic | 58% |
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | 72% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | A15 Bionic |
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | Total score | 841983 | 1021474 | CPU | 235753 | 286017 | GPU | 319963 | 388151 | MEM | 134709 | 163439 | UX | 151566 | 183864 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | A15 Bionic |
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | Single-Core | 1716 | 1168 | Multi-Core | 4732 | 4246 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | A15 Bionic |
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | Frequency | 3232 MHz | 3050 MHz | Cores | 6 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | Transistors count | 15800 millions | 8400 millions | Core configuration | 2x3.23 GHz Avalanche 4x1.86 GHz Blizzard | 1x3.05 GHz ARM Cortex-X2 3x2.85 GHz ARM Cortex-A710 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A510 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 8 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x, LPDDR5 | LPDDR5x | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2800 | 7500 | Memory bandwidth | 92 | 52 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 2 MB | 128 KB | L2 cache | 4 MB | 1024 KB | L3 cache | 32 MB | 32 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.5 | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here A15 Bionic is 5% better than MediaTek Dimensity 9000 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that A15 Bionic has 2 more core than MediaTek Dimensity 9000. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Apple A15 Bionic GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | GPU Frequency | 3232 MHz | 850 MHz | GFloPS | 2989.13 | 1648 | # of Cores | 5 | 10 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2796 x 1290 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 32.2 | 39.1 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 99.5 | 121.4 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 59.5 | 72.1 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 55.6 | 66.2 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 85.2 | 103.1 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 123.9 | 149.2 | Real Racing 3 | 119.6 | 145.8 | Sniper 3D | 131.4 | 159.2 | Need for Speed No Limits | 83.1 | 101.4 | Mortal Kombat X | 86.9 | 104.2 | CSR Racing 2 | 71.3 | 87.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 12 MP | 320 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 12 MP | 48 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Apple ISP | | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 240 | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 |
Networks and NavigationModem | 5G Modem | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Download speed | 7000 MBit/s. | 7000 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 5000 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | Navigation | Galileo, NavIC, GLONASS, NavIC enabled, QZSS, GPS, SBAS, Dual frequency GNSS, Beidou, GNSS | BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF | NFC support | No | Yes | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A15 Bionic is better: 13
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 9000 is better: 26 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
A15 Bionic SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Apple A15 Bionic Vs Google Tensor G2 • Apple A15 Bionic Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Apple A15 Bionic Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Apple A15 Bionic Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Apple A15 Bionic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Apple A15 Bionic Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Apple A15 Bionic Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Apple A15 Bionic Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Apple A15 Bionic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Apple A15 Bionic Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Apple A15 Bionic Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Apple A15 Bionic Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Apple A15 Bionic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Apple A15 Bionic Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Apple A15 Bionic Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Apple A15 Bionic Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 SoC Comparisons • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
| |
|