Qualcomm QCS6490 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000

Comparisons   18-02-2023
   Full comparison data of Qualcomm QCS6490 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications of the processors, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like Geekbench, PassMark, 3DMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu, PCMark, Vellamo, Neocore, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of chipsets in Madout2, Call of Duty, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, GTA, Minecraft etc.
   After reading the results these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chipset is better to buy QCS6490 or MediaTek Dimensity 9000.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

QCS6490

42%

MediaTek Dimensity 9000

73%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

QCS6490

81%

MediaTek Dimensity 9000

82%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

QCS6490

40%

MediaTek Dimensity 9000

72%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	QCS6490	MediaTek Dimensity 9000
Total score	592145	1021474
CPU	165802	286017
GPU	225011	388151
MEM	94749	163439
UX	106579	183864

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	QCS6490	MediaTek Dimensity 9000
Single-Core	920	1168
Multi-Core	3344	4246

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	QCS6490	MediaTek Dimensity 9000
Frequency	2700 MHz	3050 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	6 nm	5 nm
Transistors count	5200 millions	8400 millions
Core configuration	1x2.7 GHz Kryo 670 Gold Plus 3x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 Gold 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 670 Silver	1x3.05 GHz ARM Cortex-X2 3x2.85 GHz ARM Cortex-A710 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	8 W
Memory type	LPDDR5	LPDDR5x
Max. Memory	16 Gb	32 Gb
Memory Frequency	3200	7500
Memory bandwidth	16	52
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	512 KB	128 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1024 KB
L3 cache	2 MB	32 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.3-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 9000 is 11% better than QCS6490 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Adreno 643L	Mali-G710 MC10
GPU Frequency	812 MHz	850 MHz
GFloPS	1573	1648
# of Cores		10
# of Shader Units	576
Display	2520 x 1080 pixels	2560 x 1440 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	26.4	39.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	67.5	121.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	92.6	72.1
Call of Duty: Mobile	51.5	66.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	57.8	103.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	84.9	149.2
Real Racing 3	115.8	145.8
Sniper 3D	148.5	159.2
Need for Speed No Limits	129.7	101.4
Mortal Kombat X	120.8	104.2
CSR Racing 2	120.9	87.8

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	192 MP	320 MP
Dual Camera resolution	36 MP	48 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)	Qualcomm Spectra 570L
Video Encoding FPS	60	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	HDR10+, HDR10, HLG, H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), VP8, VP9	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Modem QCM6490 5G	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	3700 MBit/s.	7000 MBit/s.
Upload speed	1600 MBit/s.	2500 MBit/s.
Navigation	NavIC enabled, GBeidou, GLONASS, GPS, QZSS, Galileo	BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm QCS6490 is better: 8
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 9000 is better: 33
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

QCS6490 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• QCS6490 specs and review.

MediaTek Dimensity 9000 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 specs and review.