|
Apple A15 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 |
|
Comparisons 14-09-2022 Full comparison data of Apple A15 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like 3DMark, PCMark, PassMark, Quadrant, Neocore, Vellamo, Geekbench, GFXBench, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of SoCs in PUBG, Minecraft, Fortnite, Madout2, GTA, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty etc. After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy A15 Bionic or Snapdragon 865.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreA15 Bionic | 60% |
Snapdragon 865 | 42% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)A15 Bionic | 80% |
Snapdragon 865 | 73% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingA15 Bionic | 58% |
Snapdragon 865 | 39% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | A15 Bionic |
Snapdragon 865 | Total score | 841983 | 583551 | CPU | 235753 | 163401 | GPU | 319963 | 221754 | MEM | 134709 | 93372 | UX | 151566 | 105047 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | A15 Bionic |
Snapdragon 865 | Single-Core | 1716 | 934 | Multi-Core | 4732 | 3435 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | A15 Bionic |
Snapdragon 865 | Frequency | 3232 MHz | 2840 MHz | Cores | 6 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 15800 millions | | Core configuration | 2x3.23 GHz Avalanche 4x1.86 GHz Blizzard | 8x2.84 GHz Kryo 585 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 10 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x, LPDDR5 | 4x16bit, LPDDR5 | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2800 | 2750 | Memory bandwidth | 92 | 44 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB | L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 32 MB | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.5 | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here A15 Bionic is 12% better than Snapdragon 865 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that A15 Bionic has 2 more core than Snapdragon 865. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Apple A15 Bionic GPU | Adreno 650 | GPU Frequency | 3232 MHz | 600 MHz | GFloPS | 2989.13 | 989 | # of Cores | 5 | | # of Shader Units | | 512 | Display | 2796 x 1290 pixels | 2840 x 2160 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 32.2 | 29.4 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 99.5 | 62.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 59.5 | 58.6 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 55.6 | 59.2 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 85.2 | 49.6 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 123.9 | 76.5 | Real Racing 3 | 119.6 | 73.3 | Sniper 3D | 131.4 | 111.3 | Need for Speed No Limits | 83.1 | 93.8 | Mortal Kombat X | 86.9 | 85 | CSR Racing 2 | 71.3 | 70.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 12 MP | 200 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 12 MP | 25 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Apple ISP | Qualcomm Spectra 480 | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 960 | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | Dolby Vision, H.265 (HEVC), HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, H.264 (AVC), VP8, VP9 |
Networks and NavigationModem | 5G Modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X55 Modem-RF System 5G | Download speed | 7000 MBit/s. | 7500 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 5000 MBit/s. | 3000 MBit/s. | Navigation | Galileo, NavIC, GLONASS, NavIC enabled, QZSS, GPS, SBAS, Dual frequency GNSS, Beidou, GNSS | SBAS, NavIC enabled, Galileo, GPS, GNSS, QZSS, Dual frequency GNSS, GLONASS, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A15 Bionic is better: 29
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 is better: 12 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, as well as read the test results at the links below.
A15 Bionic SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Apple A15 Bionic Vs Google Tensor G2 • Apple A15 Bionic Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Apple A15 Bionic Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Apple A15 Bionic Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Apple A15 Bionic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Apple A15 Bionic Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Apple A15 Bionic Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Apple A15 Bionic Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Apple A15 Bionic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Apple A15 Bionic Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Apple A15 Bionic Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Apple A15 Bionic Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Apple A15 Bionic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Apple A15 Bionic Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Apple A15 Bionic Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Apple A15 Bionic Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
Snapdragon 865 SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 875 • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs A13 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm QCM5430 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra
| |
|