MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T

Comparisons   19-05-2022
   Detailed testing data of MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as Geekbench, Quadrant, PassMark, Neocore, GFXBench, 3DMark, Vellamo, PCMark, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Madout2, GTA, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Minecraft, PUBG, Fortnite etc.
   After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 9000 or MediaTek Kompanio 1300T.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Dimensity 9000

73%

MediaTek Kompanio 1300T

50%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Dimensity 9000

82%

MediaTek Kompanio 1300T

79%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Dimensity 9000

72%

MediaTek Kompanio 1300T

48%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Dimensity 9000	MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
Total score	1021474	694535
CPU	286017	194474
GPU	388151	263927
MEM	163439	111132
UX	183864	125023

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Dimensity 9000	MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
Single-Core	1168	1477
Multi-Core	4246	4585

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Dimensity 9000	MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
Frequency	3050 MHz	2600 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	5 nm	6 nm
Transistors count	8400 millions	5800 millions
Core configuration	1x3.05 GHz ARM Cortex-X2 3x2.85 GHz ARM Cortex-A710 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A510	2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	8 W	10 W
Memory type	LPDDR5x	LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	32 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	7500	2133
Memory bandwidth	52	29
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	128 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1024 KB	320 KB
L3 cache	32 MB	8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 9000 is 14% better than MediaTek Kompanio 1300T in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G710 MC10	Mali-G77 MC9
GPU Frequency	850 MHz	800 MHz
GFloPS	1648	504
# of Cores	10	9
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	2560 x 1440 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	39.1	27.5
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	121.4	83.1
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	72.1	50.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	66.2	46.5
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	103.1	70.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	149.2	102.5
Real Racing 3	145.8	88.9
Sniper 3D	159.2	65.1
Need for Speed No Limits	101.4	60.5
Mortal Kombat X	104.2	65.9
CSR Racing 2	87.8	60.9

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	320 MP	200 MP
Dual Camera resolution	48 MP	32 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1	H.264, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	7000 MBit/s.	4700 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2500 MBit/s.	2500 MBit/s.
Navigation	BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF	Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5, Glonass L1OF
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 9000 is better: 30
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 1300T is better: 5
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MediaTek Dimensity 9000 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 specs and review.

MediaTek Kompanio 1300T SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Kompanio 1300T specs and review.