|
AMD EPYC 9274F vs AMD EPYC 73F3 |
|
Processor comparisons 11-03-2023 If you have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 9274F vs AMD EPYC 73F3 and see which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, programming, streaming, rendering, video editing. Here you can find all information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like WPrime, SuperPi, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PCMark 10, Furmark, VeraCrypt, RealBench, Prime95, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 7zip, Handbrake, Gears 5, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, UserBenchmark, 3DMark, PassMark, AIDA64. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Valorant
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fortnite
- Halo Infinite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Fallout 76
- Last Man Standing
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 73F3 or AMD EPYC 9274F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 9274F | 69% |
EPYC 73F3 | 62% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9274F is 10% better than EPYC 73F3. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 9274F | 73% |
EPYC 73F3 | 62% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: League of Legends (LOL), Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Horizon Zero Dawn, Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 129.7 | 109.5 | Valorant | 147.4 | 124.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 82.5 | 69.7 | Apex Legends | 138.5 | 116.9 | Call of Duty Warzone | 110.5 | 93.3 | Overwatch | 119.4 | 100.8 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 101.7 | 85.8 | DOOM Eternal | 73.7 | 62.2 | Warzone | 114.9 | 97.0 | Assassin's Creed | 123.8 | 104.5 | Valheim | 122.3 | 103.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 9274F | 21% |
EPYC 73F3 | 15% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9274F is more energy efficient than the EPYC 73F3 since it has less power consumption: 320W vs. 240W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, streaming, machine learning, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9274F |
AMD EPYC 73F3 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 154 | 125 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 7827 | 5148 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 321 | 234 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 16627 | 10911 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 846 | 577 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 43295 | 28372 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9274F |
AMD EPYC 73F3 | Single-Core | 1946 | 1297 | Multi-Core | 63524 | 41617 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9274F |
AMD EPYC 73F3 | Single-Core | 2073 | 1147 | Multi-Core | 40852 | 21059 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 9274F |
AMD EPYC 73F3 | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP5 | SP3 | Core name | Genoa | Milan | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 3 | Generation | 4 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 4.3 MHz | 4 MHz | Frequency | 4.05 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Cores | 24 | 16 | Threads | 48 | 32 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 54000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 320 W | 240 W | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | 100-000000794 100-000000794WOF | 100-000000321 100-100000321WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9274F is 13% better than EPYC 73F3 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9274F has 8 more core than EPYC 73F3. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9274F is better: 33
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 73F3 is better: 1 However, it should be understood that all the data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD EPYC 9274F and AMD EPYC 73F3 before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 9274F Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 73F3 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|