|
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ vs AMD EPYC 9274F |
|
Processor comparisons 27-03-2023 For example there are difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ vs AMD EPYC 9274F and understand which is better for games or normal use for video editing, rendering, machine learning, programming, streaming. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), DaVinci Resolve Studio, VeraCrypt, RealBench, 3DMark, Prime95, PCMark 10, PassMark, WPrime, SuperPi, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, AIDA64, Handbrake, Blender, Blender, Furmark, MATLAB, 7zip, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Gears 5. And how good the processors are in games: - World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valorant
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fortnite
- Halo Infinite
- Valheim
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9274F or Intel Xeon Gold 5415+.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Xeon Gold 5415+ | 56% |
EPYC 9274F | 69% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9274F is 18% better than Xeon Gold 5415+. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Xeon Gold 5415+ | 56% |
EPYC 9274F | 73% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Forza Horizon 4, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 99.8 | 129.7 | Valorant | 113.4 | 147.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.5 | 82.5 | Apex Legends | 106.6 | 138.5 | Call of Duty Warzone | 85.0 | 110.5 | Overwatch | 91.9 | 119.4 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 78.2 | 101.7 | DOOM Eternal | 56.7 | 73.7 | Warzone | 88.5 | 114.9 | Assassin's Creed | 95.3 | 123.8 | Valheim | 94.1 | 122.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Xeon Gold 5415+ | 21% |
EPYC 9274F | 21% |
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ |
AMD EPYC 9274F | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 447 | 154 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1426 | 7827 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 983 | 321 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3506 | 16627 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 687 | 846 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 19920 | 43295 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ |
AMD EPYC 9274F | Single-Core | 6191 | 1946 | Multi-Core | 20277 | 63524 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ |
AMD EPYC 9274F | Single-Core | 986 | 2073 | Multi-Core | 11560 | 40852 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ |
AMD EPYC 9274F | Announcement date | March 15, 2023 | November 10, 2022 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP5 | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Genoa | Architecture | x86 | Zen 4 | Generation | 4 | 4 | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 4.3 MHz | Frequency | 2.9 MHz | 4.05 MHz | Cores | 8 | 24 | Threads | 16 | 48 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | Transistors count | 32000 millions | 64000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 150 W | 320 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | DDR5 | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | 4096 Gb | Memory Frequency | | 4800 | Memory bandwidth | | 460.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 22.5 MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | Part number | | 100-000000794 100-000000794WOF | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9274F is 28% better than Xeon Gold 5415+ in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9274F has 16 more core than Xeon Gold 5415+. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ is better: 6
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9274F is better: 27 Although it should be realized that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ and AMD EPYC 9274F before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9274F Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|