|
MediaTek MT6739 vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which chip or processor is better? Detailed compare data of benchmarks MediaTek MT6739 vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430, speed examination of GPUs Mali-T628 MP6 and PowerVR GE8100. This performance comparison involves two processors: MT6739 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Exynos 5 Octa 5430 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A15). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests like Vellamo, Neocore, GFXBench, Mozilla Kraken, PassMark, Geekbench, Octane V2, WebXPRT 3, AnTuTu 8, Quadrant, 3DMark, PCMark, and how good the chipsets are in games Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, PUBG, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D etc. After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy MT6739 or Exynos 5 Octa 5430 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMT6739 | 2% |
Exynos 5 Octa 5430 | 4% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MT6739 | 29% |
Exynos 5 Octa 5430 | 36% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMT6739 | 1% |
Exynos 5 Octa 5430 | 2% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MT6739 |
Exynos 5 Octa 5430 | Total score | 39505 | 56436 | CPU | 11054 | 15801 | GPU | 15020 | 21452 | MEM | 6323 | 9024 | UX | 7112 | 10151 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MT6739 |
Exynos 5 Octa 5430 | Single-Core | 104 | 146 | Multi-Core | 482 | 657 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MT6739 |
Exynos 5 Octa 5430 | Frequency | 1500 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 4 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 28 nm | 20 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A15 4x1.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | Power consumption (TDP) | | 3 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR3 | Max. Memory | 3 Gb | 4 Gb | Memory Frequency | 667 | 1650 | Memory bandwidth | 6.4 | 14 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | | 384 KB | L2 cache | | 512 KB | L3 cache | | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 5 Octa 5430 is 25% better than MT6739 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MT6739 has 4 more core than Exynos 5 Octa 5430. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR GE8100 | Mali-T628 MP6 | GPU Frequency | 570 MHz | 680 MHz | GFloPS | 11.2 | 176 | # of Cores | 1 | 6 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1440 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 12.7 | 18.4 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 32.1 | 47.6 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 21.7 | 32.3 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 18.7 | 28.3 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 27.9 | 39.5 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 40.8 | 59.9 | Real Racing 3 | 27.1 | 40.4 | Sniper 3D | 47.7 | 51.7 | Need for Speed No Limits | 26 | 51.7 | Mortal Kombat X | 34.7 | 51.7 | CSR Racing 2 | 23.9 | 38.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 13 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 120 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP8 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 42 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 11 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6739 is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 is better: 34 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors MT6739 and Exynos 5 Octa 5430, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
MT6739 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs MediaTek MT8167A • Vs MediaTek MT6731 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
Exynos 5 Octa 5430 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
| |
|