 |
Intel Core i9-9900T vs AMD Ryzen 5 4600G |
|
Processor comparisons 24-03-2021
You may have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i9-9900T vs AMD Ryzen 5 4600G and see which is better for games or normal use for streaming, video editing, programming, rendering, machine learning. Here you can find all information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like SuperPi, Gears 5, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, Prime95, Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 7zip, UserBenchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10, 3DMark, Blender, WPrime, Blender, RealBench, Furmark, PassMark, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15).
Gaming performance of processors in: - Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Borderlands 3
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- DOOM: Eternal
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- Valorant
- Overwatch
- Last Man Standing
- Valheim
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Halo Infinite
- Death Stranding
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 5 4600G or Intel Core i9-9900T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i9-9900T | 54% |
Ryzen 5 4600G | 55% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 5 4600G is 1% better than Core i9-9900T. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i9-9900T | 54% |
Ryzen 5 4600G | 53% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Ghostrunner, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, NBA 2K20, Battlefield V, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, League of Legends (LOL), Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 95.4 | 94.9 | | Valorant | 108.4 | 107.8 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.7 | 60.4 | | Apex Legends | 101.9 | 101.4 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 81.3 | 80.9 | | Overwatch | 87.8 | 87.3 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.8 | 74.4 | | DOOM Eternal | 54.2 | 53.9 | | Warzone | 84.5 | 84.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 91.0 | 90.6 | | Valheim | 89.9 | 89.5 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i9-9900T | 106% |
Ryzen 5 4600G | 62% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-9900T is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 5 4600G as it consumes less power: 35W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-9900T |
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 191 | 195 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1644 | 1524 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 449 | 472 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3920 | 3398 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 951 | 1221 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 9218 | 9348 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-9900T |
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G | | Single-Core | 2489 | 2720 | | Multi-Core | 13885 | 16486 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-9900T |
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G | | Single-Core | 1113 | 1216 | | Multi-Core | 7212 | 6756 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i9-9900T |
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G | | Announcement date | October 01, 2019 | July 21, 2020 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1151-2 | AM4 | | Core name | Coffee Lake | Renoir | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 9 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 MHz | 4.2 MHz | | Frequency | 2.1 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 6 | | Threads | 16 | 12 | | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 8600 millions | 4600 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 65 W | | Memory type | DDR4-2666 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | | | L1 cache | | 384KB | | L2 cache | | 3MB | | L3 cache | 16 MB | 8MB | | Overclocking | No | Yes | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | 100-000000147
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 5 4600G is 43% better than Core i9-9900T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-9900T has 2 more core than Ryzen 5 4600G. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-9900T is better: 23
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 5 4600G is better: 15
Although it should be realized that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i9-9900T and AMD Ryzen 5 4600G before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i9-9900T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i7-5960X
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Core i7-7800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Xeon W-10855M
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i7-8700B
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300F
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i9-10900E
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i5-1235UL
• Vs Core i5-1245UL
• Vs Core i5-1245UE
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
|
|
|
