|
Intel Core i7-3630QM vs Intel Core i7-4770 |
|
Processor comparisons 17-03-2021 Perhaps you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice after reading the detailed tests Intel Core i7-3630QM vs Intel Core i7-4770 and decide which is better for games or normal use for rendering, video editing, programming, streaming, machine learning. Here is useful information from many benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like MATLAB, UserBenchmark, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark, Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, SuperPi, PassMark, AIDA64, 7zip, VeraCrypt, 3DMark, Gears 5, WPrime, RealBench, Blender, Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- Valheim
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Rainbow Six Siege
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valorant
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Fortnite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fallout 76
- Cyberpunk 2077
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-4770 or Intel Core i7-3630QM.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i7-3630QM | 51% |
Core i7-4770 | 52% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-4770 is 1% better than Core i7-3630QM. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i7-3630QM | 51% |
Core i7-4770 | 52% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Microsoft Flight Simulator, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 91.1 | 92.1 | Valorant | 103.5 | 104.7 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.0 | 58.6 | Apex Legends | 97.3 | 98.4 | Call of Duty Warzone | 77.6 | 78.5 | Overwatch | 83.9 | 84.8 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.4 | 72.2 | DOOM Eternal | 51.8 | 52.3 | Warzone | 80.8 | 81.6 | Assassin's Creed | 87.0 | 87.9 | Valheim | 85.9 | 86.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i7-3630QM | 57% |
Core i7-4770 | 38% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-3630QM is more energy efficient than the Core i7-4770 since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 84W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, streaming, programming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-3630QM |
Intel Core i7-4770 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 120 | 141 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 590 | 690 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 245 | 355 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1230 | 1349 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 722 | 1102 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3469 | 3271 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-3630QM |
Intel Core i7-4770 | Single-Core | 1699 | 2149 | Multi-Core | 5080 | 7010 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-3630QM |
Intel Core i7-4770 | Single-Core | 780 | 974 | Multi-Core | 3044 | 4033 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i7-3630QM |
Intel Core i7-4770 | Announcement date | January 01, 2012 | April 01, 2013 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | rPGA988B | LGA1150 | Core name | Ivy Bridge | Haswell | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 3 | 4 | Turbo Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 3.9 MHz | Frequency | 2.4 MHz | 3.4 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 8 | 8 | Bus rate | 5 GT/s | 5 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 22 nm | 22 nm | Transistors count | 2460 millions | 2460 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 84 W | Memory type | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 8 MB | Overclocking | Yes | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-4770 is 29% better than Core i7-3630QM in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-3630QM is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-4770 is better: 25 All the number in the table above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i7-3630QM and Intel Core i7-4770 before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i7-3630QM Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Pentium Gold G6400
Intel Core i7-4770 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Core i5-4690K • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i3-8100 • Vs Core i5-6600K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Core i3-6100 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
| |
|