 |
Intel Core i7-1365U vs Intel Pentium 8500 |
|
Processor comparisons 30-01-2023
If you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i7-1365U vs Intel Pentium 8500 tests and see which is better for games or simple use for video editing, programming, machine learning, streaming, rendering. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Blender, Furmark, RealBench, WPrime, Prime95, MATLAB, SuperPi, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 7zip, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Dolphin Emulator, 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Handbrake, Gears 5, PCMark 10, GeekBench 6, 5.2, VeraCrypt, Blender, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, PassMark.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - DOOM: Eternal
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Valorant
- Last Man Standing
- Fortnite
- Death Stranding
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Borderlands 3
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Pentium 8500 or Intel Core i7-1365U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i7-1365U | 57% |
Pentium 8500 | 54% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-1365U is 5% better than Pentium 8500. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i7-1365U | 56% |
Pentium 8500 | 53% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Metro Exodus, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Control, NBA 2K20, Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Horizon Zero Dawn, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL), Half-Life: Alyx, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, DOTA 2A.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 98.6 | 93.7 | | Valorant | 112.0 | 106.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 62.7 | 59.6 | | Apex Legends | 105.3 | 100.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 84.0 | 79.8 | | Overwatch | 90.7 | 86.2 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 77.3 | 73.4 | | DOOM Eternal | 56.0 | 53.2 | | Warzone | 87.4 | 83.0 | | Assassin's Creed | 94.1 | 89.4 | | Valheim | 93.0 | 88.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i7-1365U | 371% |
Pentium 8500 | 369% |
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-1365U is more energy efficient than the Pentium 8500 as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 9W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-1365U |
Intel Pentium 8500 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 306 | 184 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2303 | 1348 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 749 | 441 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5240 | 3062 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1764 | 1035 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 17293 | 10094 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-1365U |
Intel Pentium 8500 | | Single-Core | 4141 | 2421 | | Multi-Core | 24215 | 14131 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-1365U |
Intel Pentium 8500 | | Single-Core | 1671 | 998 | | Multi-Core | 10364 | 5542 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i7-1365U |
Intel Pentium 8500 | | Announcement date | January 17, 2023 | January 07, 2022 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCBGA1744 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Alder Lake-U | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 12 | | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 MHz | 4.4 MHz | | Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 1 MHz | | Cores | 10 | 5 | | Threads | 12 | 6 | | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm | | Transistors count | 9800 millions | 9800 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 9 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 32 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | 2MB | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 24 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-1365U is 74% better than Pentium 8500 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-1365U has 5 more core than Pentium 8500. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-1365U is better: 30
The number of parameters for which Intel Pentium 8500 is better: 2
Although it should be realized that all the figures in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i7-1365U and Intel Pentium 8500 before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i7-1365U Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
Intel Pentium 8500 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Xeon W-10855M
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Core i7-7800X
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
|
|
|
