|
Intel Core i7-1265UL vs Intel Core i9-9820X |
|
Processor comparisons 11-09-2022 If you have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i7-1265UL vs Intel Core i9-9820X and see which is better for games or normal use for video editing, machine learning, streaming, programming, rendering. Here is all information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as 3DMark, WPrime, Blender, Gears 5, GeekBench 6, 5.2, SuperPi, RealBench, MATLAB, PassMark, AIDA64, 7zip, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, Prime95, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, Handbrake, UserBenchmark, Furmark, Dolphin Emulator, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Halo Infinite
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Fortnite
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Overwatch
- Fallout 76
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
- Valorant
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-9820X or Intel Core i7-1265UL.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i7-1265UL | 55% |
Core i9-9820X | 56% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-9820X is 1% better than Core i7-1265UL. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i7-1265UL | 54% |
Core i9-9820X | 56% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: League of Legends (LOL), Forza Horizon 4, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), DOTA 2A, Control, Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 95.7 | 100.2 | Valorant | 108.8 | 113.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.9 | 63.8 | Apex Legends | 102.2 | 107.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 81.6 | 85.4 | Overwatch | 88.1 | 92.2 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.1 | 78.6 | DOOM Eternal | 54.4 | 56.9 | Warzone | 84.8 | 88.8 | Assassin's Creed | 91.4 | 95.6 | Valheim | 90.3 | 94.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i7-1265UL | 302% |
Core i9-9820X | 25% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-1265UL is more energy efficient than the Core i9-9820X since it has less power consumption: 15W vs. 165W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, video rendering or video editing, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-1265UL |
Intel Core i9-9820X | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 250 | 184 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1842 | 1987 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 603 | 422 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 4184 | 4677 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1413 | 1320 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 13792 | 14283 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-1265UL |
Intel Core i9-9820X | Single-Core | 3307 | 2448 | Multi-Core | 19308 | 20453 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-1265UL |
Intel Core i9-9820X | Single-Core | 1363 | 1256 | Multi-Core | 7571 | 11942 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i7-1265UL |
Intel Core i9-9820X | Announcement date | September 22, 2022 | October 01, 2018 | Type | Embedded | Desktop | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCLGA2066 | Core name | Alder Lake | Skylake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 12 | 9 | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 MHz | 4.1 MHz | Frequency | 1.8 MHz | 3.3 MHz | Cores | 10 | 10 | Threads | 12 | 20 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 9800 millions | 8600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 165 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4-2666 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 85 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 16.5 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-9820X is 45% better than Core i7-1265UL in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-1265UL is better: 11
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-9820X is better: 21 However, it should be realized that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i7-1265UL and Intel Core i9-9820X before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i7-1265UL Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i3-12100E • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i3-12100TE • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Core i7-1265UE • Vs Core i7-1255UL • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i5-1245UL • Vs Core i5-1250PE • Vs Core i3-1220PE
Intel Core i9-9820X Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-7920X • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-12500E • Vs Core i5-12500TE • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i3-12100E • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i3-12100TE • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i5-1250PE
| |
|