|
Intel Core i9-9820X vs Intel Core i5-11600T |
|
Processor comparisons 23-03-2021 If you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i9-9820X vs Intel Core i5-11600T tests and understand which is better for games or simple use for rendering, programming, streaming, machine learning, video editing. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Gears 5, Blender, Furmark, AIDA64, 3DMark, Handbrake, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, WPrime, MATLAB, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 7zip, Dolphin Emulator, DaVinci Resolve Studio, RealBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Prime95, PCMark 10, Blender, PassMark, SuperPi, UserBenchmark. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Apex Legends
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- Valorant
- Grand Theft Auto V
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fortnite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Halo Infinite
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-11600T or Intel Core i9-9820X.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i9-9820X | 56% |
Core i5-11600T | 55% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-9820X is 1% better than Core i5-11600T. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i9-9820X | 56% |
Core i5-11600T | 53% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Hitman 3, League of Legends (LOL), NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 100.2 | 94.3 | Valorant | 113.8 | 107.2 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.8 | 60.0 | Apex Legends | 107.0 | 100.8 | Call of Duty Warzone | 85.4 | 80.4 | Overwatch | 92.2 | 86.8 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 78.6 | 74.0 | DOOM Eternal | 56.9 | 53.6 | Warzone | 88.8 | 83.6 | Assassin's Creed | 95.6 | 90.0 | Valheim | 94.5 | 89.0 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i9-9820X | 25% |
Core i5-11600T | 136% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-11600T is more energy efficient than the Core i9-9820X as it consumes less power: 165W vs. 35W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-9820X |
Intel Core i5-11600T | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 184 | 176 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1987 | 1684 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 422 | 411 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 4677 | 3774 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1320 | 1072 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14283 | 9989 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-9820X |
Intel Core i5-11600T | Single-Core | 2448 | 2393 | Multi-Core | 20453 | 18222 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-9820X |
Intel Core i5-11600T | Single-Core | 1256 | 1433 | Multi-Core | 11942 | 6198 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i9-9820X |
Intel Core i5-11600T | Announcement date | October 01, 2018 | January 20, 2021 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA2066 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Skylake | Rocket Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 9 | 11 | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 4.1 MHz | Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 1.7 MHz | Cores | 10 | 6 | Threads | 20 | 12 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 8600 millions | 5400 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 165 W | 35 W | Memory type | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-3200 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 85 GB/s | 50 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | 3 MB | L3 cache | 16.5 MB | 12 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-9820X is 48% better than Core i5-11600T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-9820X has 4 more core than Core i5-11600T. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-9820X is better: 26
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-11600T is better: 6 However, it should be realized that the summary data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i9-9820X and Intel Core i5-11600T before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i9-9820X Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-7920X • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-12500E • Vs Core i5-12500TE • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i3-12100E • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i3-12100TE • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i7-1265UL • Vs Core i5-1250PE
Intel Core i5-11600T Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i3-12100E • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i3-12100TE • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Core i7-1265UE • Vs Core i7-1265UL • Vs Core i7-1255UL • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Core i5-1245UL • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Core i3-1220PE • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500
| |
|