|
Intel Core i5-1250PE vs Intel Core i7-1265UL |
|
Processor comparisons 11-09-2022 Let's say you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i5-1250PE vs Intel Core i7-1265UL tests and understand which is better for games or normal use for video editing, machine learning, streaming, rendering, programming. Here you can find useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Dolphin Emulator, WPrime, 3DMark, 7zip, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark, PCMark 10, AIDA64, PassMark, RealBench, Gears 5, SuperPi, Blender, Handbrake, UserBenchmark, Blender, VeraCrypt, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, MATLAB, Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Halo Infinite
- Valheim
- Death Stranding
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-1265UL or Intel Core i5-1250PE.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-1250PE | 56% |
Core i7-1265UL | 55% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-1250PE is 1% better than Core i7-1265UL. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-1250PE | 55% |
Core i7-1265UL | 54% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Control, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 97.1 | 95.7 | Valorant | 110.4 | 108.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.8 | 60.9 | Apex Legends | 103.8 | 102.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 82.8 | 81.6 | Overwatch | 89.4 | 88.1 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 76.2 | 75.1 | DOOM Eternal | 55.2 | 54.4 | Warzone | 86.1 | 84.8 | Assassin's Creed | 92.7 | 91.4 | Valheim | 91.6 | 90.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-1250PE | 189% |
Core i7-1265UL | 302% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-1265UL is more energy efficient than the Core i5-1250PE as it consumes less power: 28W vs. 15W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-1250PE |
Intel Core i7-1265UL | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 272 | 250 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1991 | 1842 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 653 | 603 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 4521 | 4184 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1527 | 1413 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14904 | 13792 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-1250PE |
Intel Core i7-1265UL | Single-Core | 3574 | 3307 | Multi-Core | 20866 | 19308 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-1250PE |
Intel Core i7-1265UL | Single-Core | 1595 | 1363 | Multi-Core | 8965 | 7571 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-1250PE |
Intel Core i7-1265UL | Announcement date | March 25, 2022 | September 22, 2022 | Type | Embedded | Embedded | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCBGA1744 | Core name | Alder Lake | Alder Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 12 | 12 | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 MHz | 4.8 MHz | Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 1.8 MHz | Cores | 12 | 10 | Threads | 16 | 12 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 9800 millions | 9800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 28 W | 15 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 12 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| Expansion Options
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-1250PE is 43% better than Core i7-1265UL in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-1250PE has 2 more core than Core i7-1265UL. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-1250PE is better: 24
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-1265UL is better: 3 However, it should be realized that the summary data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i5-1250PE and Intel Core i7-1265UL before making a choice which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-1250PE Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Core i5-12500TE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i5-12500E • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i3-12100E • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i3-12100TE • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Core i5-11400
Intel Core i7-1265UL Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i3-12100E • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i3-12100TE • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Core i7-1265UE • Vs Core i7-1255UL • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i5-1245UL • Vs Core i3-1220PE
| |
|