 |
Intel Core i7-1265UL vs Intel Core i3-12300T |
|
Processor comparisons 11-09-2022
If you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i7-1265UL vs Intel Core i3-12300T and understand which is better for games or normal use for streaming, programming, video editing, rendering, machine learning. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, 7zip, VeraCrypt, Handbrake, Furmark, UserBenchmark, 3DMark, PassMark, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Dolphin Emulator, SuperPi, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Gears 5, MATLAB, RealBench, WPrime, Blender, Prime95.
And how good the processors are in games: - Halo Infinite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Apex Legends
- Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valorant
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Borderlands 3
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valheim
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Overwatch
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-12300T or Intel Core i7-1265UL.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i7-1265UL | 55% |
Core i3-12300T | 56% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-12300T is 1% better than Core i7-1265UL. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i7-1265UL | 54% |
Core i3-12300T | 54% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Control, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL), Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 95.7 | 95.8 | | Valorant | 108.8 | 108.9 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.9 | 61.0 | | Apex Legends | 102.2 | 102.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 81.6 | 81.6 | | Overwatch | 88.1 | 88.2 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.1 | 75.1 | | DOOM Eternal | 54.4 | 54.4 | | Warzone | 84.8 | 84.9 | | Assassin's Creed | 91.4 | 91.4 | | Valheim | 90.3 | 90.4 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i7-1265UL | 302% |
Core i3-12300T | 161% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-1265UL is more energy efficient than the Core i3-12300T as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 35W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-1265UL |
Intel Core i3-12300T | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 250 | 259 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1842 | 1905 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 603 | 624 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 4184 | 4324 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1413 | 1462 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 13792 | 14253 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-1265UL |
Intel Core i3-12300T | | Single-Core | 3307 | 3419 | | Multi-Core | 19308 | 19953 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-1265UL |
Intel Core i3-12300T | | Single-Core | 1363 | 1692 | | Multi-Core | 7571 | 7642 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i7-1265UL |
Intel Core i3-12300T | | Announcement date | September 22, 2022 | January 07, 2022 | | Type | Embedded | Desktop | | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCBGA1744 | | Core name | Alder Lake | Alder Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 12 | 12 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 MHz | 4.2 MHz | | Frequency | 1.8 MHz | 1 MHz | | Cores | 10 | 4 | | Threads | 12 | 8 | | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 9800 millions | 9800 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 35 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | 5 MB | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 12 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-1265UL is 44% better than Core i3-12300T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-1265UL has 6 more core than Core i3-12300T. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-1265UL is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-12300T is better: 20
Although it should be understood that all the figures in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i7-1265UL and Intel Core i3-12300T before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i7-1265UL Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i3-12100E
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i9-9820X
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Core i3-12100TE
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Core i7-1265UE
• Vs Core i7-1255UL
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i5-1245UL
• Vs Core i5-1250PE
• Vs Core i3-1220PE
Intel Core i3-12300T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i3-12100TE
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i9-9820X
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Core i5-12500TE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i3-12100E
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Core i7-1265UE
• Vs Core i5-1250PE
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
|
|
|
