|
Intel Core i5-1035G4 vs Intel Core i3-10305T |
|
Processor comparisons 18-01-2022 If you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Core i5-1035G4 vs Intel Core i3-10305T and see which is better for games or normal use for rendering, machine learning, programming, video editing, streaming. Here you can find all information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like VeraCrypt, Handbrake, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Furmark, WPrime, Dolphin Emulator, GeekBench 6, 5.2, UserBenchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, 3DMark, PassMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), MATLAB, Gears 5, Prime95, AIDA64, 7zip, RealBench, SuperPi, PCMark 10. And how good the processors are in games: - Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
- Valheim
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fallout 76
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Borderlands 3
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valorant
- DOOM: Eternal
- Halo Infinite
- Apex Legends
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-10305T or Intel Core i5-1035G4.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-1035G4 | 52% |
Core i3-10305T | 52% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-1035G4 | 52% |
Core i3-10305T | 52% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Monster Hunter World, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, League of Legends (LOL), Control, Metro Exodus, DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 92.5 | 92.0 | Valorant | 105.1 | 104.6 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.9 | 58.6 | Apex Legends | 98.8 | 98.3 | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.8 | 78.4 | Overwatch | 85.1 | 84.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.5 | 72.2 | DOOM Eternal | 52.5 | 52.3 | Warzone | 82.0 | 81.6 | Assassin's Creed | 88.3 | 87.8 | Valheim | 87.2 | 86.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-1035G4 | 260% |
Core i3-10305T | 123% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-1035G4 is more energy efficient than the Core i3-10305T as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 35W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-1035G4 |
Intel Core i3-10305T | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 172 | 184 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 657 | 925 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 434 | 428 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1595 | 2094 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1092 | 1113 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 4332 | 4325 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-1035G4 |
Intel Core i3-10305T | Single-Core | 2365 | 2490 | Multi-Core | 8380 | 8654 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-1035G4 |
Intel Core i3-10305T | Single-Core | 1172 | 1295 | Multi-Core | 4395 | 3945 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-1035G4 |
Intel Core i3-10305T | Announcement date | November 07, 2019 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | FCBGA1526 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Ice Lake | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 10 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 4 MHz | Frequency | 1.1 MHz | 3 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 8 | 8 | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 4800 millions | 2600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 35 W | Memory type | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-3733 | DDR4-2666 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 58.3 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 8 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-10305T is 63% better than Core i5-1035G4 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-1035G4 is better: 18
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-10305T is better: 13 Although it should be realized that all the data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i5-1035G4 and Intel Core i3-10305T before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-1035G4 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-9600T • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i5-9500TE • Vs Core i7-8569U • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-9850HL • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i5-8600T • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-8500B • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Core i7-8809G • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
Intel Core i3-10305T Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Core i3-11100B • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Core i5-9500TE • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i5-9600T • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8569U • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-9850HL • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i7-8809G • Vs Core i5-8500 • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Core i5-8600T • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i5-8500B • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Ryzen 5 2500X • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
| |
|