|
HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs Qualcomm 215 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which processor or chip is better? Full compare data of benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs Qualcomm 215, speed examination of GPUs Mali-T628 MP6 and Adreno 308. This performance comparison includes two processors: Kirin 930 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Qualcomm 215 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough review of all the specifications of the processors, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as Octane V2, GeekBench 6, 5, WebXPRT 3, AnTuTu, GFXBench, Mozilla Kraken, PCMark, Quadrant, 3DMark, PassMark, Neocore, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc. After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which chip is better to buy Kirin 930 or Qualcomm 215 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreKirin 930 | 3% |
Qualcomm 215 | 3% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Kirin 930 | 48% |
Qualcomm 215 | 36% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingKirin 930 | 1% |
Qualcomm 215 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Kirin 930 |
Qualcomm 215 | Total score | 48734 | 45671 | CPU | 13635 | 12790 | GPU | 18519 | 17354 | MEM | 7790 | 7309 | UX | 8765 | 8215 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Kirin 930 |
Qualcomm 215 | Single-Core | 129 | 121 | Multi-Core | 595 | 558 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Kirin 930 |
Qualcomm 215 | Frequency | 2200 MHz | 1300 MHz | Cores | 8 | 4 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 16 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 4 W | Memory type | LPDDR3x | LPDDR3 | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 2 Gb | Memory Frequency | 800 | 677 | Memory bandwidth | 28 | 6 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 64 KB | 128 KB | L2 cache | 4 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 930 is 40% better than Qualcomm 215 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Kirin 930 has -4 more core than Qualcomm 215. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-T628 MP6 | Adreno 308 | GPU Frequency | 680 MHz | 500 MHz | GFloPS | 176 | 27 | # of Cores | 6 | | # of Shader Units | | 24 | Display | 2560 x 1600 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 16.8 | 14.7 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 40.7 | 37.3 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 27.8 | 25.9 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 24.9 | 22.7 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 34.2 | 31.3 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 51.7 | 47.9 | Real Racing 3 | 55.6 | 51.8 | Sniper 3D | 61.2 | 57 | Need for Speed No Limits | 38.9 | 41.4 | Mortal Kombat X | 40.3 | 29.8 | CSR Racing 2 | 38.9 | 33.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 20 MP | 13 MP | Dual Camera resolution | | 8 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | | Qualcomm Snapdragon X5 LTE modem | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 930 is better: 35
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm 215 is better: 4 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors Kirin 930 and Qualcomm 215, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Kirin 930 SoC Comparisons • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
Qualcomm 215 SoC Comparisons • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
| |
|