MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000

Comparisons   22-09-2023
   Comprehensive comparison data of MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like Neocore, Geekbench, 3DMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu, Vellamo, GFXBench, PassMark, PCMark, and how good the processors are in games Madout2, Call of Duty, Minecraft, Fortnite, PUBG, GTA, Asphalt 9 etc.
   After reading the results these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra or Kirin 9000.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra

51%

Kirin 9000

50%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra

86%

Kirin 9000

78%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra

49%

Kirin 9000

48%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra	Kirin 9000
Total score	719546	698731
CPU	201463	195645
GPU	273436	265527
MEM	115118	111800
UX	129523	125774

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra	Kirin 9000
Single-Core	1059	1023
Multi-Core	3716	3714

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra	Kirin 9000
Frequency	2200 MHz	3130 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	5 nm	5 nm
Transistors count	6200 millions
Core configuration	2x2.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A715 6x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A510	1x3 13 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 3x2.54 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x2.06 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	8 W	6 W
Memory type	LPDDR5 (Quad Channel), LPDDR4x	LPDDR5, LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	32 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	6400	1600
Memory bandwidth	48	44
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	128 KB
L2 cache	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 9000 is 29% better than MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G610 MP6	Mali-G78 MP24
GPU Frequency	600 MHz	650 MHz
GFloPS	912	1076
# of Cores	6	24
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	2560 x 1600 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	28.1	27.3
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	85.5	83.9
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	51.1	50.6
Call of Duty: Mobile	47.1	46.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	73.2	71.3
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	106.8	103.1
Real Racing 3	103.1	88.6
Sniper 3D	113.5	65.8
Need for Speed No Limits	62.6	60.7
Mortal Kombat X	82.1	65.8
CSR Racing 2	67.4	60.7

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	128 MP
Dual Camera resolution	32 MP	64 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	60
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1	H.264, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	Balong 5G
Download speed	4700 MBit/s.	15000 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2500 MBit/s.	14000 MBit/s.
Navigation	Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra is better: 28
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 9000 is better: 11
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra specs and review.

Kirin 9000 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Kirin 9000 specs and review.