HiSilicon Kirin 9000E vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which processor or chip is better? Full data of benchmarks and speed tests HiSilicon Kirin 9000E vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000, comparison of GPUs Mali-G78 MP22 and Mali-G78 MP24.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: Kirin 9000E is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A77) and Kirin 9000 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A77). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as GFXBench, Mozilla Kraken, WebXPRT 3, AnTuTu 8, Octane V2, Neocore, Vellamo, PassMark, PCMark, Geekbench, 3DMark, Quadrant, and how good the SoCs are in games Sniper 3D, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc.
   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chip is better to buy Kirin 9000E or Kirin 9000 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Kirin 9000E

48%

Kirin 9000

50%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Kirin 9000E

78%

Kirin 9000

78%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Kirin 9000E

45%

Kirin 9000

48%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Kirin 9000E	Kirin 9000
Total score	678577	698731
CPU	189996	195645
GPU	257866	265527
MEM	108569	111800
UX	122143	125774

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Kirin 9000E	Kirin 9000
Single-Core	992	1023
Multi-Core	3714	3714

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Kirin 9000E	Kirin 9000
Frequency	3130 MHz	3130 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	5 nm	5 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	1x3 13 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 3x2.54 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 4x2.06 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	1x3 13 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 3x2.54 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x2.06 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	6 W	6 W
Memory type	LPDDR5, LPDDR4x	LPDDR5, LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	16 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	1600	1600
Memory bandwidth	44	44
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G78 MP22	Mali-G78 MP24
GPU Frequency	650 MHz	650 MHz
GFloPS	986	1076
# of Cores	22	24
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1600 pixels	2560 x 1600 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	26.7	27.3
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	80.3	83.9
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	48.7	50.6
Call of Duty: Mobile	44.1	46.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	68.9	71.3
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	100.7	103.1
Real Racing 3	60.9	88.6
Sniper 3D	107.1	65.8
Need for Speed No Limits	87.7	60.7
Mortal Kombat X	70.6	65.8
CSR Racing 2	58.4	60.7

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	128 MP	128 MP
Dual Camera resolution	48 MP	64 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	60	60
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Balong 5G	Balong 5G
Download speed	15000 MBit/s.	15000 MBit/s.
Upload speed	14000 MBit/s.	14000 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 9000E is better: 4
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 9000 is better: 17
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Kirin 9000E SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Kirin 9000E specs and review.

Kirin 9000 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Kirin 9000 specs and review.