MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020

Comparisons   22-09-2023
   Comprehensive compare data of MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like AnTuTu, PassMark, Geekbench, 3DMark, GFXBench, Neocore, Vellamo, Quadrant, PCMark, and how good the SoCs are in games PUBG, Call of Duty, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Minecraft, GTA etc.
   After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chip is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra or Dimensity 7020.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra

51%

Dimensity 7020

34%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra

86%

Dimensity 7020

84%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra

49%

Dimensity 7020

32%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra	Dimensity 7020
Total score	719546	514841
CPU	201463	144158
GPU	273436	195643
MEM	115118	82373
UX	129523	92673

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra	Dimensity 7020
Single-Core	1059	825
Multi-Core	3716	2871

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra	Dimensity 7020
Frequency	2200 MHz	2200 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	5 nm	6 nm
Transistors count	6200 millions
Core configuration	2x2.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A715 6x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A510	2x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	8 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR5 (Quad Channel), LPDDR4x	LPDDR4x, LPDDR5
Max. Memory	32 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	6400	2133
Memory bandwidth	48	24
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	128 KB
L2 cache	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8.4-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G610 MP6	IMG BXM-8-256
GPU Frequency	600 MHz	800 MHz
GFloPS	912	256
# of Cores	6	8
# of Shader Units		256
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	2520 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	28.1	61.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	85.5	54.2
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	51.1	60.6
Call of Duty: Mobile	47.1	60.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	73.2	48.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	106.8	74.4
Real Racing 3	103.1	121.4
Sniper 3D	113.5	115.6
Need for Speed No Limits	62.6	85.8
Mortal Kombat X	82.1	78.6
CSR Racing 2	67.4	79.7

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	108 MP
Dual Camera resolution	32 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1	H.264, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	4700 MBit/s.	2770 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2500 MBit/s.	1500 MBit/s.
Navigation	Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC	BeiDou B1I+ B2a, NavIC, Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5
NFC support	Yes	No
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra is better: 28
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7020 is better: 12
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra specs and review.

Dimensity 7020 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Dimensity 7020 specs and review.