MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020

Comparisons   22-09-2023
   Detailed comparison data of MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020, examination of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics of the chips, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as Neocore, 3DMark, GFXBench, AnTuTu, Quadrant, Vellamo, PCMark, PassMark, Geekbench, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Minecraft, PUBG, GTA, Call of Duty, Fortnite, Madout2, Asphalt 9 etc.
   After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra or Dimensity 6020.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra

51%

Dimensity 6020

25%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra

86%

Dimensity 6020

82%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra

49%

Dimensity 6020

24%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra	Dimensity 6020
Total score	719546	348218
CPU	201463	97504
GPU	273436	132319
MEM	115118	55723
UX	129523	62679

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra	Dimensity 6020
Single-Core	1059	702
Multi-Core	3716	1698

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra	Dimensity 6020
Frequency	2200 MHz	2200 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	5 nm	7 nm
Transistors count	6200 millions
Core configuration	2x2.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A715 6x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A510	2x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	8 W	10 W
Memory type	LPDDR5 (Quad Channel), LPDDR4x	LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	32 Gb	12 Gb
Memory Frequency	6400	2133
Memory bandwidth	48	17.07
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	128 KB
L2 cache	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G610 MP6	Mali-G57 MC2
GPU Frequency	600 MHz	950 MHz
GFloPS	912	486
# of Cores	6	2
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	2520 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	28.1	26.6
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	85.5	53.2
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	51.1	57.4
Call of Duty: Mobile	47.1	39.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	73.2	45.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	106.8	72.6
Real Racing 3	103.1	85.2
Sniper 3D	113.5	91.4
Need for Speed No Limits	62.6	91.6
Mortal Kombat X	82.1	65.1
CSR Racing 2	67.4	68.7

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	64 MP
Dual Camera resolution	32 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1	H.264, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	4700 MBit/s.	2770 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2500 MBit/s.	500 MBit/s.
Navigation	Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC	BeiDou B1I+B2a, Galileo E1+E5a, QZSS L1CA+L5, Glonass L1OF, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC
NFC support	Yes	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra is better: 35
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 6020 is better: 5
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra specs and review.

Dimensity 6020 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Dimensity 6020 specs and review.