|
MediaTek MT6738 vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which chip or processor is better? Full compare data of benchmarks MediaTek MT6738 vs HiSilicon Kirin 930, speed testing of GPUs Mali-T860 MP2 and Mali-T628 MP6. This performance comparison includes two processors: MT6738 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Kirin 930 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests such as WebXPRT 3, PassMark, Quadrant, Mozilla Kraken, Octane V2, AnTuTu, Neocore, GFXBench, PCMark, Vellamo, 3DMark, Geekbench, even the gaming performance of processors in Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D, PUBG, Fortnite, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat etc. After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which chip is better to buy MT6738 or Kirin 930 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench score Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge) Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gaming
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MT6738 |
Kirin 930 | Total score | 39237 | 48734 | CPU | 10985 | 13635 | GPU | 14902 | 18519 | MEM | 6267 | 7790 | UX | 7072 | 8765 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MT6738 |
Kirin 930 | Single-Core | 104 | 129 | Multi-Core | 479 | 595 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MT6738 |
Kirin 930 | Frequency | 1500 MHz | 2200 MHz | Cores | 4 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 28 nm | 16 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR3x | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 4 Gb | Memory Frequency | 667 | 800 | Memory bandwidth | 4 | 28 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 32 KB | 64 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 4 MB | L3 cache | 1 MB | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 930 is 31% better than MT6738 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MT6738 has 4 more core than Kirin 930. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-T860 MP2 | Mali-T628 MP6 | GPU Frequency | 350 MHz | 680 MHz | GFloPS | 23.76 | 176 | # of Cores | 2 | 6 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1280 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 12.2 | 16.8 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 31.3 | 40.7 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 21.2 | 27.8 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 18.3 | 24.9 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 27.5 | 34.2 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 40.7 | 51.7 | Real Racing 3 | 42.4 | 55.6 | Sniper 3D | 46.6 | 61.2 | Need for Speed No Limits | 25.4 | 38.9 | Mortal Kombat X | 30.7 | 40.3 | CSR Racing 2 | 29.7 | 38.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 13 MP | 20 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6738 is better: 1
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 930 is better: 34 You need to know that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
MT6738 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs MediaTek MT8167A • Vs MediaTek MT6731 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S
Kirin 930 SoC Comparisons • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
| |
|