HiSilicon Kirin 930 specs
HiSilicon Kirin 930 mid-range SoC designed for installation in mobile devices such as tablets and phones, SoC release year 2015. The CPU produced by a 16 nm process. The CPU has a eight cores divided into two blocks. The first cluster ARM Cortex-A53 is the most high-performance with four cores running at 2.2 GHz. The second cluster ARM Cortex-A53 has four cores working at 2.0 GHz. The processor has support for 64-bit data. Mali-T628 MP6 GPU works with graphical data. Gadgets that have the Kirin 930 can work in LTE networks. Maximum speed of download and send are 300 MBit/s and 50 MBit/s with the modem. To understand Kirin 930 SoC is good or bad from comparisons with other processors and benchmark data.HiSilicon Kirin 930 specifications General Info Brand HiSilicon Name Kirin 930 Model Cortex-A53 Release date 2015 CPU configuration 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A53, 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 Instruction set architecture ARMv8-A Frequency 2200 MHz Cores 8 Word Size 64 bit Process 16 nm Transistor count ? Technologies CSFB, SGLTE, DSDA, R6 Class33, coprocessor i3, VoLTE/eSRVCC Power consumption (TDP) 5 W L1 cache 64 KB L2 cache 4 MB L3 cache 4 MB
Graphics GPU Mali-T628 MP6 Frequency 680 MHz Cores 6 Process 28 nm
Memory Type LPDDR3x Frequency 800 MHz Max volume 4 Gb Internal type eMMC 5.1 Memory bandwidth 28 GB/s Memory bus 2x 32 Bit
Connectivity Download speed 300 MBit/s Upload speed 50 MBit/s LTE Cat Cat-10 DL/Cat-6 UL Wi-Fi ranges a/b/g/n/ac Location GPS,Galileo,Glonass,Beidou Wi-Fi ver. 4 Bluetooth ver. 4
Cameras Main camera max resolution 20 MPix Codecs 1920 x 1080, max FPS 60. Codec: H.264
Display and Audio Maximum Display resolution 2560 x 1600 pix Video encoding Resolution FullHD, max FPS 30. Codec: H.264
• Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile • Antutu v10 • 3DMark HiSilicon Kirin 930 SoC Comparisons • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 HiSilicon Kirin 930 review VIDEO