|
Intel Core i5-1155G7 vs Intel Core i5-11600T |
|
Processor comparisons 26-06-2021 For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i5-1155G7 vs Intel Core i5-11600T tests and see which is better for games or simple use for rendering, programming, video editing, streaming, machine learning. Here is all information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as SuperPi, AIDA64, 7zip, MATLAB, PassMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PCMark 10, Blender, WPrime, Prime95, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, RealBench, Gears 5, GeekBench 6, 5.2, UserBenchmark, Handbrake, VeraCrypt, Furmark, Blender. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Apex Legends
- Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Death Stranding
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Overwatch
- DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-11600T or Intel Core i5-1155G7.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-1155G7 | 56% |
Core i5-11600T | 55% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-1155G7 is 1% better than Core i5-11600T. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-1155G7 | 54% |
Core i5-11600T | 53% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, League of Legends (LOL), Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Control, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 96.6 | 94.3 | Valorant | 109.8 | 107.2 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.5 | 60.0 | Apex Legends | 103.2 | 100.8 | Call of Duty Warzone | 82.4 | 80.4 | Overwatch | 89.0 | 86.8 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.8 | 74.0 | DOOM Eternal | 54.9 | 53.6 | Warzone | 85.7 | 83.6 | Assassin's Creed | 92.3 | 90.0 | Valheim | 91.2 | 89.0 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-1155G7 | 312% |
Core i5-11600T | 136% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-1155G7 is more energy efficient than the Core i5-11600T as it consumes less power: 20W vs. 35W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-1155G7 |
Intel Core i5-11600T | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 200 | 176 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1915 | 1684 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 468 | 411 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 4290 | 3774 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1220 | 1072 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 11356 | 9989 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-1155G7 |
Intel Core i5-11600T | Single-Core | 2719 | 2393 | Multi-Core | 20720 | 18222 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-1155G7 |
Intel Core i5-11600T | Single-Core | 1873 | 1433 | Multi-Core | 8477 | 6198 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-1155G7 |
Intel Core i5-11600T | Announcement date | June 20, 2021 | January 20, 2021 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | FCBGA1787 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Tiger Lake | Rocket Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 11 | 11 | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 MHz | 4.1 MHz | Frequency | 2.5 MHz | 1.7 MHz | Cores | 6 | 6 | Threads | 12 | 12 | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 5400 millions | 5400 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 20 W | 35 W | Memory type | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267 | DDR4-3200 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 50 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | 3 MB | 3 MB | L3 cache | 8 MB | 12 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-1155G7 is 32% better than Core i5-11600T in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-1155G7 is better: 28
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-11600T is better: 2 However, it should be realized that the summary data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i5-1155G7 and Intel Core i5-11600T before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-1155G7 Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-7920X • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-12500E • Vs Core i5-12500TE • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i3-12100E • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i3-12100TE • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i7-1265UL • Vs Core i5-1250PE • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
Intel Core i5-11600T Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i3-12100E • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i3-12100TE • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Core i7-1265UE • Vs Core i7-1265UL • Vs Core i7-1255UL • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Core i5-1245UL • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Core i3-1220PE • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500
| |
|