|
Intel Core i7-8809G vs Intel Core i3-10305T |
|
Processor comparisons 20-01-2022 Let's say you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i7-8809G vs Intel Core i3-10305T tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for rendering, streaming, machine learning, video editing, programming. Here you can find useful information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PassMark, MATLAB, Handbrake, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, UserBenchmark, 3DMark, WPrime, VeraCrypt, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 7zip, SuperPi, AIDA64, Furmark, Blender, Gears 5, PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator, Prime95, RealBench. Gaming performance of processors in: - Halo Infinite
- Overwatch
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
- Last Man Standing
- Death Stranding
- Fortnite
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- Valorant
- Apex Legends
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fallout 76
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-10305T or Intel Core i7-8809G.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i7-8809G | 52% |
Core i3-10305T | 52% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i7-8809G | 52% |
Core i3-10305T | 52% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Forza Horizon 4, NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, Monster Hunter World, Metro Exodus, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 93.1 | 92.0 | Valorant | 105.7 | 104.6 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 59.2 | 58.6 | Apex Legends | 99.4 | 98.3 | Call of Duty Warzone | 79.3 | 78.4 | Overwatch | 85.7 | 84.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 73.0 | 72.2 | DOOM Eternal | 52.9 | 52.3 | Warzone | 82.5 | 81.6 | Assassin's Creed | 88.8 | 87.8 | Valheim | 87.8 | 86.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i7-8809G | 41% |
Core i3-10305T | 123% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-10305T is more energy efficient than the Core i7-8809G as it consumes less power: 100W vs. 35W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-8809G |
Intel Core i3-10305T | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 179 | 184 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 830 | 925 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 429 | 428 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 2095 | 2094 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1132 | 1113 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 4395 | 4325 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-8809G |
Intel Core i3-10305T | Single-Core | 2488 | 2490 | Multi-Core | 8796 | 8654 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-8809G |
Intel Core i3-10305T | Single-Core | 1231 | 1295 | Multi-Core | 4960 | 3945 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i7-8809G |
Intel Core i3-10305T | Announcement date | March 07, 2018 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | BGA2270 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Kaby Lake G | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 8 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 MHz | 4 MHz | Frequency | 3.1 MHz | 3 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 8 | 8 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 3170 millions | 2600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 100 W | 35 W | Memory type | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-2666 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-8809G is 3% better than Core i3-10305T in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-8809G is better: 20
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-10305T is better: 9 However, it should be understood that all the number in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i7-8809G and Intel Core i3-10305T before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i7-8809G Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i5-8600T • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i7-9850HL • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i5-9500TE • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i7-8569U • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9600T • Vs Core i5-8500B • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i5-8500 • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Ryzen 5 2500X • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
Intel Core i3-10305T Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Core i3-11100B • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Core i5-9500TE • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i5-9600T • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8569U • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-9850HL • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i5-8500 • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Core i5-8600T • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i5-8500B • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Ryzen 5 2500X • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
| |
|