|
Intel Core i7-8809G vs Intel Core i3-10305 |
|
Processor comparisons 20-01-2022 You may have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i7-8809G vs Intel Core i3-10305 and understand which is better for games or normal use for video editing, programming, streaming, rendering, machine learning. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like 3DMark, RealBench, Prime95, Gears 5, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, WPrime, DaVinci Resolve Studio, SuperPi, PassMark, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, UserBenchmark, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10, 7zip, Furmark, Handbrake. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Fallout 76
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Apex Legends
- Valorant
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Death Stranding
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Borderlands 3
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valheim
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Overwatch
- DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-10305 or Intel Core i7-8809G.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i7-8809G | 52% |
Core i3-10305 | 52% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i7-8809G | 52% |
Core i3-10305 | 52% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), DOTA 2A, League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Battlefield V, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 93.1 | 92.1 | Valorant | 105.7 | 104.7 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 59.2 | 58.6 | Apex Legends | 99.4 | 98.4 | Call of Duty Warzone | 79.3 | 78.5 | Overwatch | 85.7 | 84.8 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 73.0 | 72.3 | DOOM Eternal | 52.9 | 52.4 | Warzone | 82.5 | 81.7 | Assassin's Creed | 88.8 | 88.0 | Valheim | 87.8 | 86.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i7-8809G | 41% |
Core i3-10305 | 68% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-10305 is more energy efficient than the Core i7-8809G since it has less power consumption: 100W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-8809G |
Intel Core i3-10305 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 179 | 190 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 830 | 954 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 429 | 441 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 2095 | 2159 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1132 | 1147 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 4395 | 4459 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-8809G |
Intel Core i3-10305 | Single-Core | 2488 | 2567 | Multi-Core | 8796 | 8922 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-8809G |
Intel Core i3-10305 | Single-Core | 1231 | 1335 | Multi-Core | 4960 | 4067 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i7-8809G |
Intel Core i3-10305 | Announcement date | March 07, 2018 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | BGA2270 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Kaby Lake G | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 8 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 MHz | 4.5 MHz | Frequency | 3.1 MHz | 3.8 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 8 | 8 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 3170 millions | 2600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 100 W | 65 W | Memory type | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-2666 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-10305 is 18% better than Core i7-8809G in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-8809G is better: 13
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-10305 is better: 16 However, it should be realized that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i7-8809G and Intel Core i3-10305 before making a decision which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i7-8809G Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i5-8600T • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i7-9850HL • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i5-9500TE • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i7-8569U • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9600T • Vs Core i5-8500B • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i5-8500 • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Ryzen 5 2500X • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
Intel Core i3-10305 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Core i3-11100B • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Core i5-9500TE • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i5-9600T • Vs Core i7-8569U • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-10710U • Vs Core i7-9850HL • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i5-8500 • Vs Core i5-9500 • Vs Core i5-8600T • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i5-8500B • Vs Core i5-8600 • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Ryzen 5 2500X • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
| |
|