|
Intel Core i3-10305 vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2021 If you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i3-10305 vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE and understand which is better for games or normal use for streaming, programming, video editing, rendering, machine learning. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, 7zip, VeraCrypt, Handbrake, Furmark, UserBenchmark, 3DMark, PassMark, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Dolphin Emulator, SuperPi, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Gears 5, MATLAB, RealBench, WPrime, Blender, Prime95. And how good the processors are in games: - Halo Infinite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Apex Legends
- Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valorant
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Borderlands 3
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valheim
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Overwatch
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE or Intel Core i3-10305.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-10305 | 52% |
Ryzen 3 3200GE | 52% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-10305 | 52% |
Ryzen 3 3200GE | 51% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, DOTA 2A, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 92.1 | 90.7 | Valorant | 104.7 | 103.1 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.6 | 57.7 | Apex Legends | 98.4 | 96.9 | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.5 | 77.3 | Overwatch | 84.8 | 83.5 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.3 | 71.1 | DOOM Eternal | 52.4 | 51.6 | Warzone | 81.7 | 80.4 | Assassin's Creed | 88.0 | 86.6 | Valheim | 86.9 | 85.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-10305 | 68% |
Ryzen 3 3200GE | 84% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 3 3200GE is more energy efficient than the Core i3-10305 as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 35W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-10305 |
AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 190 | 114 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 954 | 646 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 441 | 277 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 2159 | 1491 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1147 | 700 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 4459 | 3438 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-10305 |
AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE | Single-Core | 2567 | 2198 | Multi-Core | 8922 | 7470 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-10305 |
AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE | Single-Core | 1335 | 892 | Multi-Core | 4067 | 2682 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-10305 |
AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE | Announcement date | April 01, 2020 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1200 | AM4 | Core name | Comet Lake | Picasso | Architecture | x86 | Zen+ | Generation | 10 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 MHz | 3.8 MHz | Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 3.3 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 8 | 4 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm | Transistors count | 2600 millions | 3800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 35 W | Memory type | DDR4-2666 | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 2933 | Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | | 384KB | L2 cache | | 2MB | L3 cache | 8 MB | 4MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | YD3200C6M4MFH
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-10305 is 13% better than Ryzen 3 3200GE in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-10305 is better: 29
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE is better: 7 However, it should be realized that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i3-10305 and AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i3-10305 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Core i3-11100B • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Core i5-9500TE • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i5-9600T • Vs Core i7-8569U • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-10710U • Vs Core i7-9850HL • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i7-8809G • Vs Core i5-8500 • Vs Core i5-9500 • Vs Core i5-8600T • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i5-8500B • Vs Core i5-8600 • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Ryzen 5 2500X • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Core i5-4690K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i5-6500T
| |
|