|
Intel Core i7-8665U vs Intel Core i7-3770 |
|
Processor comparisons 20-01-2022 For example there are difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i7-8665U vs Intel Core i7-3770 and decide which is better for games or simple use for video editing, machine learning, rendering, streaming, programming. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, UserBenchmark, 7zip, VeraCrypt, PassMark, Gears 5, RealBench, Blender, AIDA64, Blender, MATLAB, Dolphin Emulator, Handbrake, WPrime, SuperPi, Furmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 3DMark, PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Cyberpunk 2077
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Apex Legends
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Last Man Standing
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valorant
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-3770 or Intel Core i7-8665U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i7-8665U | 51% |
Core i7-3770 | 51% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i7-8665U | 52% |
Core i7-3770 | 51% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 92.4 | 91.4 | Valorant | 105.0 | 103.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.8 | 58.2 | Apex Legends | 98.7 | 97.6 | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.7 | 77.9 | Overwatch | 85.0 | 84.1 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.4 | 71.7 | DOOM Eternal | 52.5 | 51.9 | Warzone | 81.9 | 81.0 | Assassin's Creed | 88.2 | 87.2 | Valheim | 87.1 | 86.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i7-8665U | 273% |
Core i7-3770 | 35% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-8665U is more energy efficient than the Core i7-3770 since it has less power consumption: 15W vs. 77W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-8665U |
Intel Core i7-3770 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 178 | 134 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 604 | 669 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 464 | 298 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1536 | 1419 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 898 | 820 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3991 | 3650 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-8665U |
Intel Core i7-3770 | Single-Core | 2334 | 2091 | Multi-Core | 6546 | 6346 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-8665U |
Intel Core i7-3770 | Single-Core | 1229 | 823 | Multi-Core | 4277 | 3319 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i7-8665U |
Intel Core i7-3770 | Announcement date | July 07, 2019 | January 01, 2012 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | FCBGA1528 | LGA1155 | Core name | Whiskey Lake | Ivy Bridge | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 8 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 MHz | 3.9 MHz | Frequency | 1.9 MHz | 3.4 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 8 | 8 | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | 5 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm | Transistors count | 1900 millions | 1440 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 77 W | Memory type | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR3 1333/1600 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-3770 is 44% better than Core i7-8665U in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-8665U is better: 28
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-3770 is better: 4 However, it should be understood that the summary data in the table above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i7-8665U and Intel Core i7-3770 before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i7-8665U Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
Intel Core i7-3770 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Core i5-4690K • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i3-8100 • Vs Core i5-6600K • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
| |
|