 |
Intel Core i5-6600K vs Intel Core i7-3770 |
|
Processor comparisons 04-02-2023
If you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision after reading the detailed tests Intel Core i5-6600K vs Intel Core i7-3770 and see which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, rendering, video editing, streaming, programming. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like WPrime, RealBench, Gears 5, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, AIDA64, 3DMark, Prime95, PassMark, UserBenchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, MATLAB, Handbrake, Furmark, Dolphin Emulator, 7zip, VeraCrypt, SuperPi, Blender, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15).
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Valheim
- Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Borderlands 3
- Grand Theft Auto V
- DOOM: Eternal
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- Overwatch
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valorant
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Apex Legends
- Fortnite
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-3770 or Intel Core i5-6600K.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-6600K | 51% |
Core i7-3770 | 51% |
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-6600K | 52% |
Core i7-3770 | 51% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, NBA 2K20, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 92.9 | 91.4 | | Valorant | 105.5 | 103.8 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 59.1 | 58.2 | | Apex Legends | 99.2 | 97.6 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 79.1 | 77.9 | | Overwatch | 85.5 | 84.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.8 | 71.7 | | DOOM Eternal | 52.8 | 51.9 | | Warzone | 82.3 | 81.0 | | Assassin's Creed | 88.6 | 87.2 | | Valheim | 87.6 | 86.2 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-6600K | 51% |
Core i7-3770 | 35% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-6600K is more energy efficient than the Core i7-3770 since it has less power consumption: 91W vs. 77W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, programming, video rendering or video editing, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-6600K |
Intel Core i7-3770 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 166 | 134 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 600 | 669 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 395 | 298 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1572 | 1419 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1041 | 820 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3965 | 3650 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-6600K |
Intel Core i7-3770 | | Single-Core | 2356 | 2091 | | Multi-Core | 6286 | 6346 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-6600K |
Intel Core i7-3770 | | Single-Core | 1399 | 823 | | Multi-Core | 4766 | 3319 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-6600K |
Intel Core i7-3770 | | Announcement date | September 26, 2015 | January 01, 2012 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1151 | LGA1155 | | Core name | Skylake | Ivy Bridge | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 6 | | | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 3.9 MHz | | Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 3.4 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 4 | | Threads | 4 | 8 | | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 5 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm | | Transistors count | 2460 millions | 1440 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 91 W | 77 W | | Memory type | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V | DDR3 1333/1600 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 32 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 8 MB | | Overclocking | No | Yes | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-6600K is 2% better than Core i7-3770 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-6600K is better: 27
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-3770 is better: 6
However, it should be realized that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i5-6600K and Intel Core i7-3770 before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-6600K Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Core i5-7500
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i5-4590
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Core i5-4460
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Core i5-3570K
• Vs Core i7-2600
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i5-2400
• Vs Core i3-8100
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Core i5-9600KF
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i5-4690K
• Vs Core i5-4570
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
Intel Core i7-3770 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-2600
• Vs Core i5-4590
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i5-4570
• Vs Core i5-2400
• Vs Core i5-4460
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Core i5-10300H
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Core i5-7300HQ
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Core i5-3570K
• Vs Core i5-6400
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Core i7-3630QM
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Pentium Gold 7505
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Pentium Gold G6500
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Core i3-9100TE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
• Vs Core i3-9350K
• Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G
• Vs Core i5-9300HF
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550U
• Vs Core i3-10305T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6605
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405U
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405
• Vs Core i3-1110G4
• Vs Core i3-1115GRE
• Vs Core i3-1115G4E
• Vs Core i3-1120G4
• Vs Core i3-1125G4
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE
• Vs Athlon 300GE
• Vs Athlon 320GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs Core i5-1030NG7
• Vs Core i3-10100T
• Vs Core i5-8260U
• Vs Core i5-4470S
• Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
• Vs Core i7-10610U
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400T
• Vs Core i7-10510Y
• Vs Core i5-10310U
• Vs Core i5-7442EQ
• Vs Core i7-8565UC
• Vs Core i7-1060NG7
• Vs Core i7-8665UE
• Vs Core i5-8265UC
• Vs Core i5-8365UE
• Vs Core i3-9100T
• Vs Core i3-9320
• Vs Core i7-7820EQ
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Core i3-8300
• Vs Core i3-9100
• Vs Core i7-8665U
• Vs Core i5-8365U
• Vs Core i3-9300T
• Vs Core i3-9350KF
• Vs Core i3-8100B
• Vs Core i5-8305G
• Vs Core i7-5850EQ
• Vs Core i5-4670R
• Vs Core i3-8100T
• Vs Core i5-8400T
• Vs Core i3-8300T
• Vs Core i3-8350K
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Core i5-4690K
• Vs Core i5-7500
• Vs Core i3-8100
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
|
|
|
