|
Intel Core i7-10810U vs Intel Core i5-10400T |
|
Processor comparisons 27-07-2021 Let's say you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i7-10810U vs Intel Core i5-10400T tests and understand which is better for games or simple use for rendering, machine learning, streaming, programming, video editing. Here you can find useful information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, PCMark 10, UserBenchmark, Handbrake, VeraCrypt, AIDA64, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 7zip, Prime95, Dolphin Emulator, PassMark, Furmark, MATLAB, WPrime, RealBench, SuperPi, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Gears 5. Gaming performance of processors in: - Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- Apex Legends
- Valheim
- Halo Infinite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fallout 76
- Fortnite
- Borderlands 3
- DOOM: Eternal
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valorant
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-10400T or Intel Core i7-10810U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i7-10810U | 52% |
Core i5-10400T | 53% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-10400T is 1% better than Core i7-10810U. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i7-10810U | 52% |
Core i5-10400T | 52% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: League of Legends (LOL), Forza Horizon 4, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), DOTA 2A, Control, Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 92.9 | 93.2 | Valorant | 105.5 | 105.9 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 59.1 | 59.3 | Apex Legends | 99.2 | 99.5 | Call of Duty Warzone | 79.2 | 79.4 | Overwatch | 85.5 | 85.8 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.8 | 73.1 | DOOM Eternal | 52.8 | 52.9 | Warzone | 82.3 | 82.6 | Assassin's Creed | 88.7 | 88.9 | Valheim | 87.6 | 87.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i7-10810U | 233% |
Core i5-10400T | 85% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-10810U is more energy efficient than the Core i5-10400T as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 35W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-10810U |
Intel Core i5-10400T | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 187 | 159 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 932 | 1137 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 436 | 366 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 2114 | 2582 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1138 | 911 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 5670 | 6245 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-10810U |
Intel Core i5-10400T | Single-Core | 2448 | 2137 | Multi-Core | 9130 | 10262 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-10810U |
Intel Core i5-10400T | Single-Core | 1049 | 901 | Multi-Core | 4781 | 5064 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i7-10810U |
Intel Core i5-10400T | Announcement date | April 01, 2020 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | FCBGA1528 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Comet Lake | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 10 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 4.9 MHz | 3.6 MHz | Frequency | 1.1 MHz | 2 MHz | Cores | 6 | 6 | Threads | 12 | 12 | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 7200 millions | 2460 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 35 W | Memory type | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133, LPDDR4-2933 | DDR4-2666 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 12 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-10400T is 44% better than Core i7-10810U in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-10810U is better: 9
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-10400T is better: 19 Although it should be understood that all the figures in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i7-10810U and Intel Core i5-10400T before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i7-10810U Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i3-11100B • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Core i5-9500TE • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i5-9600T • Vs Core i7-8569U • Vs Core i7-10710U • Vs Core i7-9850HL • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i7-8809G • Vs Core i5-8500 • Vs Core i5-9500F • Vs Core i5-9500 • Vs Core i5-8600T • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i5-8500B • Vs Core i5-8600 • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Core i5-8600K • Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
Intel Core i5-10400T Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Core i3-11100B • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Core i5-9500TE • Vs Core i7-9750HF • Vs Core i5-9600T • Vs Core i7-8569U • Vs Core i7-10710U • Vs Core i7-9850HL • Vs Core i7-9850H • Vs Core i7-9700T • Vs Core i5-8500 • Vs Core i5-9500F • Vs Core i7-8700T • Vs Core i7-9700TE • Vs Core i5-9500 • Vs Core i5-9600 • Vs Core i5-9600KF • Vs Core i5-8500B • Vs Core i5-8600 • Vs Core i7-8850H • Vs Core i9-8950HK • Vs Core i5-8600K • Vs Ryzen 5 2500X • Vs Core i7-6850K • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 3 1200
| |
|