|
Intel Core i5-1155G7 vs Intel Core i9-7920X |
|
Processor comparisons 26-06-2021 For example there are difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i5-1155G7 vs Intel Core i9-7920X and understand which is better for games or simple use for rendering, machine learning, programming, video editing, streaming. Here is useful information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like Dolphin Emulator, RealBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 7zip, Handbrake, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Prime95, 3DMark, AIDA64, VeraCrypt, WPrime, Gears 5, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PassMark, PCMark 10, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, MATLAB, Blender, Blender, UserBenchmark, SuperPi. Gaming performance of processors in: - DOOM: Eternal
- Valorant
- Borderlands 3
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fallout 76
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Death Stranding
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Apex Legends
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valheim
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- Last Man Standing
- Halo Infinite
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-7920X or Intel Core i5-1155G7.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-1155G7 | 56% |
Core i9-7920X | 57% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-7920X is 1% better than Core i5-1155G7. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-1155G7 | 54% |
Core i9-7920X | 57% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, Horizon Zero Dawn, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Battlefield V, Control, Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, NBA 2K20, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Forza Horizon 4.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 96.6 | 102.0 | Valorant | 109.8 | 115.9 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.5 | 64.9 | Apex Legends | 103.2 | 108.9 | Call of Duty Warzone | 82.4 | 86.9 | Overwatch | 89.0 | 93.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.8 | 80.0 | DOOM Eternal | 54.9 | 57.9 | Warzone | 85.7 | 90.4 | Assassin's Creed | 92.3 | 97.4 | Valheim | 91.2 | 96.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-1155G7 | 312% |
Core i9-7920X | 28% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-1155G7 is more energy efficient than the Core i9-7920X since it has less power consumption: 20W vs. 140W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, video rendering or video editing, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-1155G7 |
Intel Core i9-7920X | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 200 | 188 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1915 | 2438 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 468 | 532 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 4290 | 6318 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1220 | 1400 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 11356 | 17104 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-1155G7 |
Intel Core i9-7920X | Single-Core | 2719 | 2458 | Multi-Core | 20720 | 23494 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-1155G7 |
Intel Core i9-7920X | Single-Core | 1873 | 1206 | Multi-Core | 8477 | 13717 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-1155G7 |
Intel Core i9-7920X | Announcement date | June 20, 2021 | April 01, 2017 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | FCBGA1787 | FCLGA2066 | Core name | Tiger Lake | Skylake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 11 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 MHz | 4.3 MHz | Frequency | 2.5 MHz | 2.9 MHz | Cores | 6 | 12 | Threads | 12 | 24 | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 5400 millions | 7800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 20 W | 140 W | Memory type | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267 | DDR4-2666 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 85 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | 3 MB | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 16.5 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-7920X is 13% better than Core i5-1155G7 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-7920X has 6 more core than Core i5-1155G7. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-1155G7 is better: 11
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-7920X is better: 25 Although it should be understood that the summary data in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i5-1155G7 and Intel Core i9-7920X before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-1155G7 Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-12500E • Vs Core i5-12500TE • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i3-12100E • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i3-12100TE • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i7-1265UL • Vs Core i5-1250PE • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
Intel Core i9-7920X Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-12500E • Vs Core i5-12500TE • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i3-12300HE • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i7-1270PE • Vs Core i5-12500HL • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i3-12300HL
| |
|