|
Intel Core i5-13600T vs Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|
Processor comparisons 29-01-2023 For example there are difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the full tests Intel Core i5-13600T vs Intel Core i9-13900KS and understand which is better for games or normal use for streaming, machine learning, programming, rendering, video editing. Here you can find useful information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as VeraCrypt, UserBenchmark, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, WPrime, Handbrake, AIDA64, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Gears 5, 7zip, Prime95, Furmark, PassMark, SuperPi, Blender, RealBench. And how good the processors are in games: - Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- Watch Dogs Legion
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Death Stranding
- Halo Infinite
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-13900KS or Intel Core i5-13600T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13600T | 62% |
Core i9-13900KS | 73% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-13900KS is 15% better than Core i5-13600T. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13600T | 57% |
Core i9-13900KS | 66% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: DOTA 2A, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 100.8 | 117.3 | Valorant | 114.5 | 133.2 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.1 | 74.6 | Apex Legends | 107.6 | 125.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 85.9 | 99.9 | Overwatch | 92.8 | 107.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 79.0 | 91.9 | DOOM Eternal | 57.3 | 66.6 | Warzone | 89.3 | 103.9 | Assassin's Creed | 96.2 | 111.9 | Valheim | 95.0 | 110.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13600T | 164% |
Core i9-13900KS | 71% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-13600T is more energy efficient than the Core i9-13900KS since it has less power consumption: 35W vs. 125W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13600T |
Intel Core i9-13900KS | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 380 | 631 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3868 | 6774 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 626 | 1056 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 8582 | 15135 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2182 | 3757 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 24668 | 43688 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13600T |
Intel Core i9-13900KS | Single-Core | 1995 | 3134 | Multi-Core | 42036 | 76304 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13600T |
Intel Core i9-13900KS | Single-Core | 1730 | 2675 | Multi-Core | 12523 | 28679 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-13600T |
Intel Core i9-13900KS | Announcement date | March 18, 2023 | October 12, 2022 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1700 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Raptor Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 13 | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 MHz | 5.9 MHz | Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 4.5 MHz | Cores | 14 | 24 | Threads | 20 | 32 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 16 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 14200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 125 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 6500 | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | L2 cache | 12 MB | 8 MB | L3 cache | 24 MB | 36 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | Part number | Expansion Options
| Expansion Options
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-13900KS is 24% better than Core i5-13600T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-13900KS has 10 more core than Core i5-13600T. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13600T is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13900KS is better: 29 Although it should be understood that all the number in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i5-13600T and Intel Core i9-13900KS before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-13600T Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 5 2500X • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Intel Core i9-13900KS Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
| |
|