 |
Intel Core i5-13505H vs Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|
Processor comparisons 29-01-2023
You may have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the full tests Intel Core i5-13505H vs Intel Core i9-13900KS and decide which is better for games or normal use for rendering, streaming, programming, machine learning, video editing. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or various benchmarks. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like PassMark, AIDA64, DaVinci Resolve Studio, WPrime, Blender, Prime95, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 7zip, VeraCrypt, Handbrake, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Dolphin Emulator, Blender, RealBench, 3DMark, UserBenchmark, Furmark, MATLAB, PCMark 10, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Gears 5, SuperPi.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Last Man Standing
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Overwatch
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fortnite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valheim
- Borderlands 3
- DOOM: Eternal
- Death Stranding
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Halo Infinite
- Fallout 76
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-13900KS or Intel Core i5-13505H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-13505H | 57% |
Core i9-13900KS | 73% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-13900KS is 21% better than Core i5-13505H. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-13505H | 56% |
Core i9-13900KS | 66% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: NBA 2K20, Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), DOTA 2A, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Forza Horizon 4, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 99.1 | 117.3 | | Valorant | 112.6 | 133.2 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.1 | 74.6 | | Apex Legends | 105.9 | 125.2 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 84.5 | 99.9 | | Overwatch | 91.2 | 107.9 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 77.7 | 91.9 | | DOOM Eternal | 56.3 | 66.6 | | Warzone | 87.8 | 103.9 | | Assassin's Creed | 94.6 | 111.9 | | Valheim | 93.5 | 110.6 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-13505H | 124% |
Core i9-13900KS | 71% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-13505H is more energy efficient than the Core i9-13900KS as it consumes less power: 45W vs. 125W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, programming, machine learning, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13505H |
Intel Core i9-13900KS | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 248 | 631 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2308 | 6774 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 394 | 1056 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5092 | 15135 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1312 | 3757 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14590 | 43688 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13505H |
Intel Core i9-13900KS | | Single-Core | 1202 | 3134 | | Multi-Core | 24847 | 76304 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13505H |
Intel Core i9-13900KS | | Single-Core | 1684 | 2675 | | Multi-Core | 10878 | 28679 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-13505H |
Intel Core i9-13900KS | | Announcement date | January 14, 2023 | October 12, 2022 | | Type | Laptop | Desktop | | Socket | FCBGA1792 | FCLGA1700 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Raptor Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 13 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 MHz | 5.9 MHz | | Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 4.5 MHz | | Cores | 12 | 24 | | Threads | 16 | 32 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 14200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 125 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 6500 | | Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 6 MB | 8 MB | | L3 cache | 18 MB | 36 MB | | Overclocking | No | Yes | | Supports ECC | No | Yes | | Part number | Expansion Options
| Expansion Options
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-13900KS is 22% better than Core i5-13505H in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-13900KS has 12 more core than Core i5-13505H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13505H is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13900KS is better: 31
However, it should be realized that all the number in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i5-13505H and Intel Core i9-13900KS before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-13505H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Apple M1X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
Intel Core i9-13900KS Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-10940X
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G
• Vs Core i5-13490F
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE
• Vs Core i7-13790F
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
|
|
|
