|
Intel Core i5-13400 vs Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|
Processor comparisons 08-10-2022 Let's say you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision after reading the full tests Intel Core i5-13400 vs Intel Core i9-13900KS and understand which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, streaming, rendering, video editing, programming. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, PassMark, VeraCrypt, WPrime, Gears 5, Handbrake, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, MATLAB, SuperPi, RealBench, Furmark, Blender, Prime95, 7zip, PCMark 10, 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), UserBenchmark, AIDA64. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Fortnite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Halo Infinite
- Valheim
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Overwatch
- Valorant
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- DOOM: Eternal
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fallout 76
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- Apex Legends
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-13900KS or Intel Core i5-13400.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13400 | 59% |
Core i9-13900KS | 73% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-13900KS is 19% better than Core i5-13400. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13400 | 56% |
Core i9-13900KS | 66% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Control, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 100.3 | 117.3 | Valorant | 114.0 | 133.2 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.8 | 74.6 | Apex Legends | 107.1 | 125.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 85.5 | 99.9 | Overwatch | 92.3 | 107.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 78.6 | 91.9 | DOOM Eternal | 57.0 | 66.6 | Warzone | 88.9 | 103.9 | Assassin's Creed | 95.7 | 111.9 | Valheim | 94.6 | 110.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13400 | 91% |
Core i9-13900KS | 71% | To make a final choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-13400 is more energy efficient than the Core i9-13900KS as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 125W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, video rendering or video editing, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13400 |
Intel Core i9-13900KS | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 276 | 631 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2844 | 6774 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 457 | 1056 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6319 | 15135 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1603 | 3757 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18171 | 43688 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13400 |
Intel Core i9-13900KS | Single-Core | 1465 | 3134 | Multi-Core | 30969 | 76304 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13400 |
Intel Core i9-13900KS | Single-Core | 1786 | 2675 | Multi-Core | 12045 | 28679 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-13400 |
Intel Core i9-13900KS | Announcement date | September 23, 2022 | October 12, 2022 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1700 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Raptor Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 13 | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | 5.9 MHz | Frequency | 2.5 MHz | 4.5 MHz | Cores | 10 | 24 | Threads | 16 | 32 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 16 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 14200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 125 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 6500 | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s | L1 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 8 MB | L3 cache | 16 MB | 36 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | Yes | Part number | | Expansion Options
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-13900KS is 44% better than Core i5-13400 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-13900KS has 14 more core than Core i5-13400. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13400 is better: 1
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13900KS is better: 33 Although it should be realized that all the number in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i5-13400 and Intel Core i9-13900KS before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-13400 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i9-13900KS Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
| |
|