|
Qualcomm QCS8250 vs Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|
Comparisons 17-02-2023 Full compare data of Qualcomm QCS8250 vs Unisoc Tiger T612, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as 3DMark, Neocore, Geekbench, PCMark, PassMark, AnTuTu, Quadrant, GFXBench, Vellamo, and how good the processors are in games Asphalt 9, Madout2, Fortnite, GTA, Call of Duty, PUBG, Minecraft etc. After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy QCS8250 or Unisoc Tiger T612.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreQCS8250 | 49% |
Unisoc Tiger T612 | 16% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)QCS8250 | 77% |
Unisoc Tiger T612 | 71% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingQCS8250 | 48% |
Unisoc Tiger T612 | 15% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | QCS8250 |
Unisoc Tiger T612 | Total score | 683050 | 224582 | CPU | 191262 | 62875 | GPU | 259548 | 85351 | MEM | 109285 | 35934 | UX | 122956 | 40420 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | QCS8250 |
Unisoc Tiger T612 | Single-Core | 1073 | 367 | Multi-Core | 3756 | 1368 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | QCS8250 |
Unisoc Tiger T612 | Frequency | 2850 MHz | 1800 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.85 GHz Kryo 585 Gold 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 585 Silver | 2x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 9 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel), LPDDR4x | LPDDR4 | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2750 | 1066 | Memory bandwidth | 44 | 29 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 512 KB | 128 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.1-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here QCS8250 is 36% better than Unisoc Tiger T612 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 650 | Mali-G57 MP4 | GPU Frequency | 645 MHz | 600 MHz | GFloPS | 1348 | 498 | # of Cores | | 4 | # of Shader Units | 512 | | Display | 3840 x 2160 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 26.4 | 21.4 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 82.7 | 43.6 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 49.2 | 48.8 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 44.4 | 38.6 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 69.6 | 37.4 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 101.5 | 52.6 | Real Racing 3 | 86.5 | 85.1 | Sniper 3D | 64.9 | 106.9 | Need for Speed No Limits | 59.2 | 87.8 | Mortal Kombat X | 65.3 | 70.1 | CSR Racing 2 | 60.9 | 58.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 64 MP | 16 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 480 | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X55 Modem-RF System 5G | LTE-7 | Download speed | 7500 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 3000 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, GNSS, SBAS, Galileo, Beidou, Dual frequency GNSS, NavIC enabled, GLONASS, QZSS | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm QCS8250 is better: 35
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T612 is better: 6 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
QCS8250 SoC Comparisons • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs Apple A11 Bionic • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Apple A10 Fusion • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Samsung Exynos 880 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
Unisoc Tiger T612 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Samsung Exynos 880 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
| |
|