|
MediaTek Dimensity 8020 vs Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|
Comparisons 06-06-2023 Detailed compare data of MediaTek Dimensity 8020 vs Unisoc Tiger T612, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as Quadrant, Neocore, PCMark, Geekbench, AnTuTu, GFXBench, Vellamo, 3DMark, PassMark, even the gaming performance of chips in GTA, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Minecraft, Fortnite, Madout2 etc. After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which chipset is better to buy Dimensity 8020 or Unisoc Tiger T612.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreDimensity 8020 | 45% |
Unisoc Tiger T612 | 16% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Dimensity 8020 | 81% |
Unisoc Tiger T612 | 71% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingDimensity 8020 | 42% |
Unisoc Tiger T612 | 15% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Dimensity 8020 |
Unisoc Tiger T612 | Total score | 633998 | 224582 | CPU | 177519 | 62875 | GPU | 240920 | 85351 | MEM | 101448 | 35934 | UX | 114129 | 40420 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Dimensity 8020 |
Unisoc Tiger T612 | Single-Core | 1016 | 367 | Multi-Core | 3536 | 1368 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Dimensity 8020 |
Unisoc Tiger T612 | Frequency | 2600 MHz | 1800 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 2x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 9 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x | LPDDR4 | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4266 | 1066 | Memory bandwidth | 24 | 29 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | | 128 KB | L2 cache | | 2 MB | L3 cache | | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8.1-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Dimensity 8020 is 30% better than Unisoc Tiger T612 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G57 MP4 | GPU Frequency | 800 MHz | 600 MHz | GFloPS | 504 | 498 | # of Cores | 9 | 4 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 28.1 | 21.4 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 71.6 | 43.6 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 98.6 | 48.8 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 55.8 | 38.6 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 61.2 | 37.4 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 89.4 | 52.6 | Real Racing 3 | 196.7 | 85.1 | Sniper 3D | 216.9 | 106.9 | Need for Speed No Limits | 157.1 | 87.8 | Mortal Kombat X | 157.8 | 70.1 | CSR Racing 2 | 137.1 | 58.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 108 MP | 16 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 36 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | 5G Multi-Mode | LTE-7 | Download speed | 4700 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | Galileo E1 + E5a, NavIC, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, Glonass L1OF, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5 | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | Yes | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8020 is better: 35
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T612 is better: 5 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Dimensity 8020 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Google Tensor • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
Unisoc Tiger T612 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Samsung Exynos 880 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
| |
|