|
Intel Core i9-13900HK vs Intel Xeon Gold 6246R |
|
Processor comparisons 13-11-2022 For example you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i9-13900HK vs Intel Xeon Gold 6246R tests and see which is better for games or normal use for video editing, programming, rendering, machine learning, streaming. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 7zip, 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator, WPrime, Blender, Blender, Prime95, UserBenchmark, Handbrake, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Gears 5, Furmark, PassMark, PCMark 10, VeraCrypt, RealBench, DaVinci Resolve Studio, MATLAB, SuperPi. Gaming performance of processors in: - Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fortnite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Apex Legends
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Fallout 76
- Valorant
- Last Man Standing
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- Overwatch
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon Gold 6246R or Intel Core i9-13900HK.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i9-13900HK | 58% |
Xeon Gold 6246R | 59% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Xeon Gold 6246R is 1% better than Core i9-13900HK. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i9-13900HK | 57% |
Xeon Gold 6246R | 62% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, DOTA 2A, Hitman 3, League of Legends (LOL), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Forza Horizon 4, Ghostrunner.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 101.6 | 109.5 | Valorant | 115.4 | 124.5 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.6 | 69.7 | Apex Legends | 108.5 | 117.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 86.6 | 93.4 | Overwatch | 93.5 | 100.8 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 79.6 | 85.9 | DOOM Eternal | 57.7 | 62.2 | Warzone | 90.0 | 97.1 | Assassin's Creed | 96.9 | 104.6 | Valheim | 95.8 | 103.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i9-13900HK | 134% |
Xeon Gold 6246R | 16% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-13900HK is more energy efficient than the Xeon Gold 6246R since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 205W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-13900HK |
Intel Xeon Gold 6246R | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 282 | 179 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2730 | 5252 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 455 | 397 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6039 | 12359 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1546 | 1059 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 17328 | 29861 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900HK |
Intel Xeon Gold 6246R | Single-Core | 1415 | 2365 | Multi-Core | 29517 | 30393 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900HK |
Intel Xeon Gold 6246R | Single-Core | 1812 | 1041 | Multi-Core | 13291 | 21110 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i9-13900HK |
Intel Xeon Gold 6246R | Announcement date | November 12, 2022 | October 01, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Server | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCLGA3647 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Cascade Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 MHz | 4.1 MHz | Frequency | 2.8 MHz | 3.4 MHz | Cores | 14 | 16 | Threads | 20 | 32 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 7510 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 205 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 1 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6500 | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 8 MB | | L3 cache | 32 MB | 35.75 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Gold 6246R is 17% better than Core i9-13900HK in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Xeon Gold 6246R has 2 more core than Core i9-13900HK. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13900HK is better: 16
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 6246R is better: 22 However, it should be understood that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i9-13900HK and Intel Xeon Gold 6246R before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i9-13900HK Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i5-12600HE • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
Intel Xeon Gold 6246R Processor Comparisons • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i5-12600HE • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13700HK • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|