|
AMD EPYC 9554P vs Intel Xeon Gold 6246R |
|
Processor comparisons 11-03-2023 If you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the AMD EPYC 9554P vs Intel Xeon Gold 6246R tests and see which is better for games or simple use for video editing, programming, machine learning, streaming, rendering. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Blender, Furmark, RealBench, WPrime, Prime95, MATLAB, SuperPi, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 7zip, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Dolphin Emulator, 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Handbrake, Gears 5, PCMark 10, GeekBench 6, 5.2, VeraCrypt, Blender, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, PassMark. And how good the CPUs are in games: - DOOM: Eternal
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Valorant
- Last Man Standing
- Fortnite
- Death Stranding
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Borderlands 3
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon Gold 6246R or AMD EPYC 9554P.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 9554P | 87% |
Xeon Gold 6246R | 59% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9554P is 32% better than Xeon Gold 6246R. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 9554P | 88% |
Xeon Gold 6246R | 62% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 155.1 | 109.5 | Valorant | 176.3 | 124.5 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 98.7 | 69.7 | Apex Legends | 165.7 | 117.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 132.2 | 93.4 | Overwatch | 142.8 | 100.8 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 121.6 | 85.9 | DOOM Eternal | 88.1 | 62.2 | Warzone | 137.5 | 97.1 | Assassin's Creed | 148.1 | 104.6 | Valheim | 146.3 | 103.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 9554P | 14% |
Xeon Gold 6246R | 16% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Gold 6246R is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9554P as it consumes less power: 360W vs. 205W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9554P |
Intel Xeon Gold 6246R | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 372 | 179 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 15207 | 5252 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 697 | 397 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 32229 | 12359 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1705 | 1059 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 83804 | 29861 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9554P |
Intel Xeon Gold 6246R | Single-Core | 3590 | 2365 | Multi-Core | 122932 | 30393 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9554P |
Intel Xeon Gold 6246R | Single-Core | 1540 | 1041 | Multi-Core | 65817 | 21110 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 9554P |
Intel Xeon Gold 6246R | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | October 01, 2020 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP5 | FCLGA3647 | Core name | Genoa | Cascade Lake | Architecture | Zen 4 | x86 | Generation | 4 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 3.75 MHz | 4.1 MHz | Frequency | 3.1 MHz | 3.4 MHz | Cores | 64 | 16 | Threads | 128 | 32 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 108000 millions | 7510 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 360 W | 205 W | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | | 1 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 35.75 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | Part number | 100-000000804 100-100000804WOF | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Gold 6246R is 8% better than EPYC 9554P in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9554P has 48 more core than Xeon Gold 6246R. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9554P is better: 29
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 6246R is better: 6 Although it should be understood that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD EPYC 9554P and Intel Xeon Gold 6246R before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 9554P Processor Comparisons • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Intel Xeon Gold 6246R Processor Comparisons • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i5-12600HE • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13700HK • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|