|
Intel Core i7-13700 vs AMD EPYC 7663 |
|
Processor comparisons 12-10-2022 You may have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i7-13700 vs AMD EPYC 7663 and decide which is better for games or normal use for streaming, programming, machine learning, video editing, rendering. Here is useful information from many benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like WPrime, 7zip, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, RealBench, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, Furmark, Handbrake, Gears 5, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10, Blender, SuperPi, PassMark, Prime95, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), DaVinci Resolve Studio. And how good the processors are in games: - World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valheim
- Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Death Stranding
- Valorant
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Apex Legends
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Halo Infinite
- Overwatch
- Fallout 76
- DOOM: Eternal
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7663 or Intel Core i7-13700.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i7-13700 | 65% |
EPYC 7663 | 68% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7663 is 4% better than Core i7-13700. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i7-13700 | 61% |
EPYC 7663 | 76% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Control, Hitman 3, Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 109.1 | 135.1 | Valorant | 123.9 | 153.5 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 69.4 | 86.0 | Apex Legends | 116.5 | 144.3 | Call of Duty Warzone | 93.0 | 115.1 | Overwatch | 100.4 | 124.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 85.5 | 105.9 | DOOM Eternal | 62.0 | 76.8 | Warzone | 96.7 | 119.7 | Assassin's Creed | 104.1 | 128.9 | Valheim | 102.9 | 127.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i7-13700 | 56% |
EPYC 7663 | 12% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-13700 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7663 as it consumes less power: 125W vs. 240W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-13700 |
AMD EPYC 7663 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 459 | 184 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 4740 | 7606 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 760 | 347 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 10525 | 16121 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2669 | 852 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 30269 | 41920 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13700 |
AMD EPYC 7663 | Single-Core | 2441 | 1794 | Multi-Core | 51586 | 61492 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13700 |
AMD EPYC 7663 | Single-Core | 2118 | 874 | Multi-Core | 20651 | 46160 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i7-13700 |
AMD EPYC 7663 | Announcement date | September 24, 2022 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Desktop | Server | Socket | FCLGA1700 | SP3 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Milan | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3 | Generation | 13 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Frequency | 4.2 MHz | 2 MHz | Cores | 16 | 56 | Threads | 24 | 112 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 78000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 125 W | 240 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 8 MB | | L3 cache | 30 MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | | 100-000000318 100-100000318WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-13700 is 52% better than EPYC 7663 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7663 has 40 more core than Core i7-13700. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-13700 is better: 18
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7663 is better: 19 Although it should be realized that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i7-13700 and AMD EPYC 7663 before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i7-13700 Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
AMD EPYC 7663 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|