|
Intel Core i5-13400T vs Intel Core i7-13700 |
|
Processor comparisons 30-01-2023 If there are difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i5-13400T vs Intel Core i7-13700 and see which is better for games or simple use for programming, rendering, machine learning, streaming, video editing. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like UserBenchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Prime95, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Handbrake, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, RealBench, PCMark 10, MATLAB, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AIDA64, Gears 5, Blender, 7zip, VeraCrypt, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, WPrime, 3DMark. And how good the processors are in games: - Last Man Standing
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Fortnite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Apex Legends
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Halo Infinite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fallout 76
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valheim
- DOOM: Eternal
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Death Stranding
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-13700 or Intel Core i5-13400T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13400T | 58% |
Core i7-13700 | 65% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-13700 is 10% better than Core i5-13400T. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13400T | 56% |
Core i7-13700 | 61% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, Control, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 99.5 | 109.1 | Valorant | 113.0 | 123.9 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.3 | 69.4 | Apex Legends | 106.2 | 116.5 | Call of Duty Warzone | 84.8 | 93.0 | Overwatch | 91.5 | 100.4 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 78.0 | 85.5 | DOOM Eternal | 56.5 | 62.0 | Warzone | 88.2 | 96.7 | Assassin's Creed | 94.9 | 104.1 | Valheim | 93.8 | 102.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13400T | 160% |
Core i7-13700 | 56% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-13400T is more energy efficient than the Core i7-13700 as it consumes less power: 35W vs. 125W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, machine learning, video rendering or video editing, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13400T |
Intel Core i7-13700 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 274 | 459 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2665 | 4740 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 442 | 760 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5901 | 10525 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1509 | 2669 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 16937 | 30269 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13400T |
Intel Core i7-13700 | Single-Core | 1380 | 2441 | Multi-Core | 28855 | 51586 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13400T |
Intel Core i7-13700 | Single-Core | 1680 | 2118 | Multi-Core | 11233 | 20651 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-13400T |
Intel Core i7-13700 | Announcement date | January 11, 2023 | September 24, 2022 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1700 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Raptor Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 13 | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 MHz | 5.2 MHz | Frequency | 3 MHz | 4.2 MHz | Cores | 10 | 16 | Threads | 16 | 24 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 16 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 14200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 125 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 6500 | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s | L1 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 8 MB | L3 cache | 20 MB | 30 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | Yes | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-13700 is 28% better than Core i5-13400T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-13700 has 6 more core than Core i5-13400T. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13400T is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-13700 is better: 31 However, it should be realized that all the data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i5-13400T and Intel Core i7-13700 before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-13400T Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 5 2500X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
Intel Core i7-13700 Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
| |
|