 |
Intel Core i5-12500HL vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|
Processor comparisons 11-09-2022
Let's say there are difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the full tests Intel Core i5-12500HL vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and see which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, rendering, programming, streaming, video editing. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 7zip, Blender, Handbrake, Gears 5, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, Prime95, MATLAB, PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator, RealBench, SuperPi, UserBenchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Furmark, VeraCrypt, PassMark, 3DMark, WPrime, AIDA64, DaVinci Resolve Studio.
And how good the processors are in games: - Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Apex Legends
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- DOOM: Eternal
- Overwatch
- Borderlands 3
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Death Stranding
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valorant
- Valheim
- Last Man Standing
- Fallout 76
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X or Intel Core i5-12500HL.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-12500HL | 57% |
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | 57% |
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-12500HL | 56% |
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | 57% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Forza Horizon 4, DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Hitman 3, Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), Monster Hunter World, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 98.8 | 100.5 | | Valorant | 112.2 | 114.2 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 62.9 | 63.9 | | Apex Legends | 105.5 | 107.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 84.2 | 85.6 | | Overwatch | 90.9 | 92.5 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 77.4 | 78.8 | | DOOM Eternal | 56.1 | 57.1 | | Warzone | 87.5 | 89.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 94.3 | 95.9 | | Valheim | 93.2 | 94.8 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-12500HL | 130% |
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | 20% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-12500HL is more energy efficient than the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 180W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-12500HL |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 322 | 173 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2332 | 2433 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 767 | 406 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5291 | 5326 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1788 | 900 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 17431 | 16353 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-12500HL |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | | Single-Core | 4185 | 2316 | | Multi-Core | 24401 | 23152 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-12500HL |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | | Single-Core | 1759 | 1085 | | Multi-Core | 10557 | 12245 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-12500HL |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | | Announcement date | September 27, 2022 | April 01, 2017 | | Type | Embedded | Desktop | | Socket | FCBGA1744 | sTR4 | | Core name | Alder Lake | Whitehaven | | Architecture | x86 | Zen | | Generation | 12 | 1 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 MHz | 4 MHz | | Frequency | 2.5 MHz | 3.5 MHz | | Cores | 12 | 12 | | Threads | 16 | 24 | | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 10200 millions | 11600 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 180 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | | 2667 | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | | | L1 cache | | 1.125MB | | L2 cache | | 6MB | | L3 cache | 18 MB | 32MB | | Overclocking | No | Yes | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| YD192XA8UC9AE
YD192XA8AEWOF
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 28% better than Core i5-12500HL in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-12500HL is better: 15
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is better: 22
However, it should be realized that all the number in the table above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i5-12500HL and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X before making a decision which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-12500HL Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i3-12300HE
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i9-10920X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i9-7940X
• Vs Core i9-7960X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i7-1270PE
• Vs Core i9-7920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i5-12500E
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i5-12500TE
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i3-12300HL
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i9-10920X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i9-7940X
• Vs Core i9-7960X
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i9-9940X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i9-7920X
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Core i9-9820X
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12500E
• Vs Core i5-12500TE
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i3-12300HE
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i7-1270PE
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i5-1250PE
• Vs Core i3-12300HL
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Core i5-13500T
|
|
|
