|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Intel Core i9-7940X |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2021 Perhaps you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Intel Core i9-7940X and decide which is better for games or simple use for programming, rendering, streaming, machine learning, video editing. Here is useful information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like Furmark, PassMark, RealBench, MATLAB, AIDA64, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Gears 5, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, Blender, PCMark 10, Prime95, Dolphin Emulator, WPrime, SuperPi, VeraCrypt, 7zip, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 3DMark. And how good the processors are in games: - Grand Theft Auto V
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Death Stranding
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
- Overwatch
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
- Halo Infinite
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-7940X or AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | 57% |
Core i9-7940X | 58% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-7940X is 1% better than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | 57% |
Core i9-7940X | 58% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 100.5 | 103.4 | Valorant | 114.2 | 117.5 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.9 | 65.8 | Apex Legends | 107.3 | 110.5 | Call of Duty Warzone | 85.6 | 88.2 | Overwatch | 92.5 | 95.2 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 78.8 | 81.1 | DOOM Eternal | 57.1 | 58.8 | Warzone | 89.1 | 91.7 | Assassin's Creed | 95.9 | 98.7 | Valheim | 94.8 | 97.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | 20% |
Core i9-7940X | 25% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-7940X is more energy efficient than the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X since it has less power consumption: 180W vs. 165W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, machine learning, video rendering or video editing, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
Intel Core i9-7940X | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 173 | 188 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2433 | 2849 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 406 | 607 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5326 | 5465 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 900 | 1578 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 16353 | 15728 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
Intel Core i9-7940X | Single-Core | 2316 | 2533 | Multi-Core | 23152 | 26889 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
Intel Core i9-7940X | Single-Core | 1085 | 1263 | Multi-Core | 12245 | 15127 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
Intel Core i9-7940X | Announcement date | April 01, 2017 | April 01, 2017 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | sTR4 | FCLGA2066 | Core name | Whitehaven | Skylake | Architecture | Zen | x86 | Generation | 1 | 7 | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 4.3 MHz | Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 3.1 MHz | Cores | 12 | 14 | Threads | 24 | 28 | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 11600 millions | 7800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 180 W | 165 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4-2666 | Max. Memory | | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2667 | | Memory bandwidth | | 85 GB/s | L1 cache | 1.125MB | | L2 cache | 6MB | | L3 cache | 32MB | 19.25 MB | Overclocking | Yes | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | YD192XA8UC9AE YD192XA8AEWOF
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 11% better than Core i9-7940X in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-7940X has 2 more core than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-7940X is better: 29 Although it should be realized that the summary data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Intel Core i9-7940X before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-7920X • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-12500E • Vs Core i5-12500TE • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i3-12300HE • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i7-1270PE • Vs Core i5-12500HL • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i5-1250PE • Vs Core i3-12300HL • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Core i5-13500T
Intel Core i9-7940X Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-7920X • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i5-12600HE • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i3-12300HE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i5-12500HL • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i5-12600HL • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i3-12300HL • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i7-13700H
| |
|