|
Intel Core i3-9300T vs Intel Core i5-6400 |
|
Processor comparisons 20-01-2022 If you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i3-9300T vs Intel Core i5-6400 tests and understand which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, video editing, programming, streaming, rendering. Here is all information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Blender, PassMark, Prime95, VeraCrypt, GeekBench 6, 5.2, DaVinci Resolve Studio, WPrime, AIDA64, SuperPi, MATLAB, 7zip, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Handbrake, Gears 5, RealBench, UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Dolphin Emulator, 3DMark, Furmark, PCMark 10. Gaming performance of processors in: - DOOM: Eternal
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Borderlands 3
- Fortnite
- Overwatch
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fallout 76
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valheim
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-6400 or Intel Core i3-9300T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-9300T | 51% |
Core i5-6400 | 51% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-9300T | 51% |
Core i5-6400 | 51% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Horizon Zero Dawn, NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 91.5 | 91.3 | Valorant | 103.9 | 103.7 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.2 | 58.1 | Apex Legends | 97.7 | 97.5 | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.0 | 77.8 | Overwatch | 84.2 | 84.0 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.7 | 71.6 | DOOM Eternal | 52.0 | 51.9 | Warzone | 81.1 | 80.9 | Assassin's Creed | 87.3 | 87.1 | Valheim | 86.3 | 86.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-9300T | 94% |
Core i5-6400 | 49% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-9300T is more energy efficient than the Core i5-6400 as it consumes less power: 35W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-9300T |
Intel Core i5-6400 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 157 | 140 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 618 | 497 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 417 | 275 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1528 | 1061 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 822 | 1001 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3192 | 3997 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-9300T |
Intel Core i5-6400 | Single-Core | 2335 | 1957 | Multi-Core | 6386 | 5167 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-9300T |
Intel Core i5-6400 | Single-Core | 995 | 959 | Multi-Core | 3402 | 3221 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-9300T |
Intel Core i5-6400 | Announcement date | July 07, 2019 | April 01, 2015 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1151 | LGA 1151 | Core name | Coffee Lake | Skylake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 9 | 6 | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 3.3 MHz | Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 2.7 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 4 | 4 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 2400 millions | 2460 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 65 W | Memory type | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | 34.1 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 6 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-9300T is 15% better than Core i5-6400 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-9300T is better: 27
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-6400 is better: 4 However, it should be understood that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i3-9300T and Intel Core i5-6400 before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-9300T Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F
Intel Core i5-6400 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Core i5-4690K
| |
|