|
Intel Core i3-10100T vs Intel Core i5-6500 |
|
Processor comparisons 03-04-2021 For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i3-10100T vs Intel Core i5-6500 tests and understand which is better for games or simple use for video editing, machine learning, streaming, rendering, programming. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as 7zip, WPrime, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Dolphin Emulator, UserBenchmark, Blender, AIDA64, VeraCrypt, Blender, SuperPi, Gears 5, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, RealBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Furmark, 3DMark, PassMark, Prime95, PCMark 10, MATLAB, Handbrake. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Valheim
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Overwatch
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valorant
- Fortnite
- Death Stranding
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-6500 or Intel Core i3-10100T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-10100T | 52% |
Core i5-6500 | 51% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-10100T is 1% better than Core i5-6500. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-10100T | 52% |
Core i5-6500 | 51% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Hitman 3, League of Legends (LOL), Forza Horizon 4, Control, NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Metro Exodus, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 92.1 | 91.4 | Valorant | 104.7 | 103.9 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.6 | 58.2 | Apex Legends | 98.4 | 97.6 | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.5 | 77.9 | Overwatch | 84.8 | 84.1 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.2 | 71.7 | DOOM Eternal | 52.3 | 51.9 | Warzone | 81.6 | 81.0 | Assassin's Creed | 87.9 | 87.3 | Valheim | 86.9 | 86.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-10100T | 106% |
Core i5-6500 | 51% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-10100T is more energy efficient than the Core i5-6500 since it has less power consumption: 35W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-10100T |
Intel Core i5-6500 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 171 | 153 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 862 | 565 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 399 | 354 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1947 | 1299 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 969 | 842 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3765 | 2928 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-10100T |
Intel Core i5-6500 | Single-Core | 2397 | 2149 | Multi-Core | 7532 | 5644 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-10100T |
Intel Core i5-6500 | Single-Core | 1121 | 1004 | Multi-Core | 4020 | 3346 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-10100T |
Intel Core i5-6500 | Announcement date | April 01, 2020 | April 01, 2015 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1200 | LGA 1151 | Core name | Comet Lake | Skylake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 10 | 6 | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 3.6 MHz | Frequency | 3 MHz | 3.2 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 8 | 4 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 2600 millions | 1760 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 65 W | Memory type | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 34.1 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 6 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-6500 is 6% better than Core i3-10100T in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-10100T is better: 29
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-6500 is better: 2 However, it should be realized that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i3-10100T and Intel Core i5-6500 before making a choice which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-10100T Processor Comparisons • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Core i3-8350K
Intel Core i5-6500 Processor Comparisons • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Core i5-4690K • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i3-8100 • Vs Core i5-6600K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
| |
|