|
Intel Core i3-10100T vs Intel Core i3-1120G4 |
|
Processor comparisons 03-04-2021 Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i3-10100T vs Intel Core i3-1120G4 tests and understand which is better for games or simple use for programming, machine learning, video editing, streaming, rendering. Here is all information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as PassMark, RealBench, SuperPi, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, Blender, WPrime, MATLAB, PCMark 10, Furmark, 7zip, Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, UserBenchmark, 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Prime95, Gears 5, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), AIDA64, Dolphin Emulator. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Valorant
- Overwatch
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
- Apex Legends
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Grand Theft Auto V
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-1120G4 or Intel Core i3-10100T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-10100T | 52% |
Core i3-1120G4 | 52% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-10100T | 52% |
Core i3-1120G4 | 51% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Forza Horizon 4, League of Legends (LOL), Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Horizon Zero Dawn, NBA 2K20, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, Control, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 92.1 | 91.5 | Valorant | 104.7 | 104.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.6 | 58.2 | Apex Legends | 98.4 | 97.7 | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.5 | 78.0 | Overwatch | 84.8 | 84.2 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.2 | 71.7 | DOOM Eternal | 52.3 | 52.0 | Warzone | 81.6 | 81.1 | Assassin's Creed | 87.9 | 87.3 | Valheim | 86.9 | 86.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-10100T | 106% |
Core i3-1120G4 | 525% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-1120G4 is more energy efficient than the Core i3-10100T as it consumes less power: 35W vs. 10W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-10100T |
Intel Core i3-1120G4 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 171 | 185 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 862 | 727 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 399 | 490 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1947 | 1796 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 969 | 966 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3765 | 3751 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-10100T |
Intel Core i3-1120G4 | Single-Core | 2397 | 3235 | Multi-Core | 7532 | 7506 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-10100T |
Intel Core i3-1120G4 | Single-Core | 1121 | 1577 | Multi-Core | 4020 | 3437 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-10100T |
Intel Core i3-1120G4 | Announcement date | April 01, 2020 | February 24, 2021 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FCLGA1200 | FCBGA1449 | Core name | Comet Lake | Tiger Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 10 | 11 | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Frequency | 3 MHz | 1.5 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 8 | 8 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 2 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | 2600 millions | 3200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 10 W | Memory type | DDR4-2666 | LPDDR4x-4267 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 8 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-10100T is 50% better than Core i3-1120G4 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-10100T is better: 22
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-1120G4 is better: 10 However, it should be realized that all the figures in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i3-10100T and Intel Core i3-1120G4 before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-10100T Processor Comparisons • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Core i3-8350K
Intel Core i3-1120G4 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300U
| |
|